It's normal to develop some black technology in the future, right?

Chapter 421 Of course we can talk
It’s not that Americans don’t want to condemn, but because they also want to replicate China’s operations.

Since China can consume part of its nuclear bomb stockpile by changing the orbit of asteroids, America naturally wants to do so.

You have to know that the life cycle of a nuclear bomb is extremely long because of its raw materials. Especially today when technology is extremely advanced, the life cycle of a nuclear bomb can be between thirty and fifty years.

Moreover, the life cycle here only refers to nuclear materials. Components other than nuclear materials need to be replaced regularly, that is, the so-called non-nuclear components, including fuses, explosives, electronic devices, etc. The aging rate of these components is much faster than that of nuclear materials.

Explosives may deteriorate due to chemical stability issues, resulting in a decrease in explosive power or failure to detonate normally. Electronic devices may also malfunction due to factors such as aging and moisture of electronic components, affecting the detonation and control functions of nuclear warheads.

So if we make a simple comparison, the maintenance cost is much higher than the production cost. A country like China has a legitimate reason to consume its nuclear bombs and can continuously iterate its technology in this way. America certainly also wants to adopt this approach.

Moreover, Chen Yuanguang revealed a very crucial piece of information during the interview, that is, the time difference. There is no human base on the moon now, so asteroids can fall on the lunar surface without any restrictions.

But this period of time will not last too long. China will build a preliminary lunar base this year. America has completed its plan to return to the moon this year and will also build a preliminary base on the moon within the next two years.

Other capable countries will follow suit. In this case, China can ensure that its trajectory change technology is advanced enough through past launches, so advanced that asteroids will not hit the bases of human countries. If America does not use the current time window to develop its own nuclear bomb trajectory change technology as soon as possible, then even if it is developed in the future, they will have no actual scenario for use.

So even if the White House wants to issue a statement to condemn and hopes to block the way for those who come later, I am against it. After the Donald Trump Party comes to power, they want to develop nuclear bomb trajectory change technology, which has nothing to do with me. When that time comes, it will not be me, the Elephant Party, who will be accused of double standards.

The White House's actions were blocked by the entire bureaucratic system in Washington. First of all, the next election does not mean the Democratic Party has no chance. Second, doing so will be detrimental to the entire America.

So compared with China’s usual technological breakthroughs, this time was particularly quiet.

The Times, as an English media, directly exposed America's thoughts:
"In this incident of China's sudden nuclear missile change of trajectory, the White House's statement was unprecedentedly quiet. It was not at all hysterical like in the past, portraying any technological breakthrough in China as a threat.

I think this is not because, as the outside world speculates, the White House personally handled the leak of China's room-temperature superconducting technology, but because the White House knows that it will also take the same technical route as China.

If America condemns China now, it will face a boomerang and equally strong condemnation in the near future. The White House does not want its current remarks to impose constraints on its future self."

If the Times can see through the White House's tricks, then other mainstream media can naturally do the same.

The successful nuclear bomb change has reduced a lot of disputes around the world. The whole of Southeast Asia has already leaned towards China, and after this time, this trend is completely irreversible.

Now no one talks about the rise of the East and the decline of the West anymore, because this is an obvious reality and an irreversible trend. The military strength that China has deployed is sufficient to protect itself from development without being affected.

This kind of peace guarantee is not only within its own borders, but can radiate to the entire Southeast Asia.

Therefore, no matter how powerful they are, the narrative logic they still insist on is nothing more than that America and a bunch of so-called allies don't want to play with you anymore, so you bring your poor brothers in Asia, Africa and Latin America and let them suck your blood so you have to be obedient.

The whole of Europe is being invaded by Chinese products, and Europe's infrastructure has been monopolized by China. If it were not for the principle of trade protection, China would have to build factories in Europe if it wanted to sell new energy vehicles to Europe, and the European economy would have collapsed long ago.

The reality is in front of us, but the gods insist on this rhetoric. Why? Because this rhetoric can be maintained for a long enough time. It is impossible for the old Chinese to lead the poor brothers in Asia, Africa and Latin America to catch up with the economic circle of developed countries in a short period of time, right?

If you choose the wrong target, you may be hit in the face by a boomerang within two years.

After all, in today's simplified Chinese Internet, the gods are a minority among the minority. If you are not careful, bloggers like Black History Bot will dig up their remarks from two years ago and slap them in the face.

"Given the rapid development of space technology, we hope to hold a temporary meeting like this before the 32nd United Nations Climate Change Conference to discuss the possible impact of China's recent use of nuclear missile trajectory change technology on the Earth, and whether China and other countries that may use this technology need to exercise control in the future."

In England, this type of news is not discussed or paid as much attention as the Premier League.

France is better, but only to a limited extent.

However, the news of China's nuclear missile changing its trajectory was hotly discussed on major forums in Japan. This heated discussion was not because people were against China doing so, but because they hoped that China could use a nuclear bomb to shoot down Furukawa Satoshi who was drifting in space.

Previously, Satoshi Furukawa secretly left the International Space Station in an escape capsule, and then JAXA and NASA discussed rescue.

The first time, JAXA paid 18.67 billion US dollars to NASA, and NASA selected Boeing through bidding, yes, it had to be bid, and it only took one day from bidding to bid opening.

When this news came out, JAXA officials were really shocked. After asking, they found out that SpaceX was not the bidder. In any case, the winning bidder was Boeing, and we followed the most formal process.

After winning the bid, Boeing launched their CST-200 Starliner to carry out the rescue mission in less than a week.

When Boeing was communicating with JAXA, it repeatedly emphasized that this is no longer CST-100, but CST-200, and there will definitely be no accidents.

The Chinese were able to rescue 11 astronauts on the International Space Station, so can’t we at Boeing rescue one astronaut?

Can't the century-old Boeing be compared to China's Guangjia Aerospace, which was established less than ten years ago?

The more Boeing vowed, the less confident JAXA became.

The result was of course as expected. Boeing's rescue failed. A small accident occurred during the docking process and the docking was not successful.

After returning, NASA communicated with JAXA and said that the last time it cost less than 20 billion US dollars, and this time you need to pay a little less, 15 billion US dollars will be enough, and we will try again.

The agreement they signed does not include liability, because no one dares to promise to rescue the aircraft 20%. In other words, it costs Boeing nearly $ billion to go up.

This time, JAXA refused to pay the 15 billion yen no matter what. As a part of the Japanese bureaucracy, JAXA's bureaucratic procrastination skills began to show their best.

The reason why Boeing's Starliner failed to dock successfully for the first time was that subsequent reports showed that it was because of a malfunction of the Starliner's timer, which resulted in its failure to enter the scheduled orbit at the scheduled time, ultimately leading to the docking failure.

This reason can make JAXA collapse, because when the Starliner model was still CST-100, its first test flight failed to dock with the national space station due to this reason.

As a result, even with this CST-200, it still made the same low-level mistake as the first time. The timer is the most basic precision tool, but it can still make mistakes.

JAXA kept delaying, and they knew that spending another $15 billion would be a waste of money. It would be better to let Satoshi Furukawa starve to death in space, which would be considered his final contribution to Japan.

The final result was that Satoshi Furukawa was dragged into space and disappeared without a trace. He was probably dead.

After this incident was reported, it was jokingly called the first space mummy.

Neon is quite dissatisfied with this, who wants such a number one title.

After China changed its course this time, there was a voice in the Japanese community calling for China to launch a nuclear bomb to blow up the escape capsule containing Furukawa Satoshi.

The logic of the Japanese is that Furukawa Satoshi is Japanese, and China's nuclear bombing of Furukawa Satoshi is also a nuclear bomb on Japan, so the past hatred can be written off, and a nuclear bomb is enough to vent the anger. In this way, Japan became the only country to be bombed twice.

Read the error-free version at 69shuba! 6=9+shu_ba is the first to publish this novel.

Even some bureaucrats in Tokyo think so. They want to let Satoshi Furukawa make use of his remaining energy. Otherwise, when JAXA's financial expenditure is announced at the beginning of next year, it will show that nearly 20 billion US dollars were spent to save Satoshi Furukawa, and he has not been rescued yet. There will be a lot of criticism on Japanese Twitter again.

Of course, after this news was passed back to the simplified Chinese Internet, the older Chinese were very dissatisfied and felt that the Japanese were wishful thinking.

Back at the United Nations, the entire hall was filled with people, and everyone hoped to get a positive statement from China.

Europe and the United States still have a strong control over public opinion. It’s okay for Japan to discharge nuclear wastewater, but it’s a problem for China to launch a nuclear bomb in deep space.

Many countries are thousands of miles away from China, and China has no interests in them. Exploding a nuclear bomb is a pure loss-making business. No matter what Zenith technology China has, it can't be used on them, but they just care about this matter.

“We need to carefully consider the use of nuclear weapons in space, even though Dr. Wright has repeatedly stressed that the use of nuclear weapons in space would have minimal impact on human environmental protection.

But this is Dr. Wright's own statement after all. As the main developer of the technology and the party with the greatest stake in it, his views cannot be used as a basis.

In addition, there may be no impact now, but because nuclear bombs are constantly being launched, the clustering effect they produce will have an impact on us in the future.

In short, China should not use nuclear bomb trajectory change technology before fully evaluating the issue."

Everyone was a little surprised that the American representative was also present.

After all, ever since the Elephant Party took office in the White House, American representatives have consistently refused to participate in discussions at the United Nations on climate issues, refused to attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference, and even refused to sign the Paris Climate Agreement.

This time, the American side actually came to this informal meeting.

".The Chinese side will issue a detailed report to explain it to you all."

In China, people usually make a series of righteous speeches before actually getting down to work.

The real work this time is reporting. I use the report to prove that our actions will not cause pollution to the earth.

"The report cannot explain the problem. The best way is to make the model of nuclear bomb trajectory change public. We simulate the pollution that may be caused by the explosion dust through computers, and the probability of the dust drifting into the earth's atmosphere.

I think that the report alone cannot explain the doubts of other countries at all." The representative of America said slowly.

This kind of conference is just a meeting for bickering and no consensus can be reached at all.

In the private communication afterwards, the Chinese man finally put forward his own conditions:
"If all countries are willing to continue to implement the Paris Climate Agreement, are willing to give a specific timeline for a complete ban on fuel vehicles, have a specific timeline for clean energy to account for more than 80% of their energy consumption, have a detailed schedule, and implement relevant plans every year, then China is willing to make concessions on stopping the use of nuclear bomb trajectory change technology."

Don't you say we should protect the environment and the earth? Then don't use gasoline cars or fossil fuels. Let's use electric cars and clean energy.

Previously, European countries all had a timetable, such as how many years it would take to stop using fuel vehicles.

Different countries have committed to different times. Norway and the Netherlands are the most radical, planning for 2025, Germany and England for 2030, and other countries for 2035.

But now that the expected time is getting closer, all of them have been postponed without exception, either postponed or not mentioned at all.

American has never promised anything, let alone clean energy.

Therefore, China put forward its own negotiation conditions.

(End of this chapter)