The Four Steps to the Sky

Passers-by and Daoist Leader Theme: A bunch of sycophants. . . "First of all, I'm not a troll. I just stopped by to read the book by Long Shao of the Qidian Dameng. After reading a few chapters, I can only say that this book is beyond my understanding of the Internet... I will not comment on other things. ...

It's just that I don't know that the vests of those who write long reviews and sycophants in this book review area seem to have novels that hit the street.I really want to say, you can write such a wonderful long comment on Long Shao, why not write a wonderful novel to the tens of millions of readers at the starting point. . . .I deeply despise those who come to ask for rewards from Young Master Long against their conscience.Not much else to say. . .It's all on the boutique channel. . , Even Dianniang bowed her head and surrendered. . .I sincerely hope that the local tyrant Long will write less books and write a real net. . . "

The author replied: Another kid passing by who didn’t read my preface carefully, and at the same time thinks he can define what is the Internet in the true sense, and it can only be said that those who are not serious will always fail.

Besides, coming to my place and leaving a bunch of sycophants' words means you are even more scumbag, really.

Reading friend Shancao: Said to Long Yinyue: Uncle Long, I just saw it a few days ago

When a person is autonomous or self-determining.He is in a state of "positive" freedom.This freedom is the "freedom to do".

Negative freedom refers to freedom in a "passive" sense.That is to say, people are not subject to the coercion of others in their will, and are not subject to interference from others in their actions.That is, the state of "freedom from coercion and interference".

The word "freedom" in the modern sense was introduced from Japan, which used the word "freedom" in ancient Chinese books to correspond to "lberty" for the first time when translating foreign documents.

On the controversial issue of translation, Yan also used the word "ziyao" instead.However, the word "freedom" was finally handed down and accepted by the people.

The concept of freedom is more popular in the current world.It is argued that freedom is one of the greatest agents of human progress.

Freedom is the right to do anything that harms others.The bottom line and principle of freedom is to protect the freedom of every individual.

Therefore, the wealth and human rights of citizens should not be violated and secured by laws drafted as a contract between the people.

The right to procession and assembly, the right to publish books, and the right to monitor the news are fundamental human rights.

Regarding the relationship between the state and individuals, it is believed that the rights of people before the emergence of the state are more precious and inalienable than the rights of the state.

No country has the right to restrict people's happiness and the right to pursue happiness.The concept of restricting the freedom that citizens should have comes from the inheritance of illegal old ideas such as "divine right of the king" and "family world".

All actions that do not violate the freedom of others should be free and lawful.This is the common concept of "human rights above sovereignty" in modern times.

The country should protect the human rights of the people, and take the responsibility of building people's happiness and protecting human rights as its own responsibility, which is also a reasonable prerequisite for the existence of a country.Adhering to humanism and respecting people is now the most mainstream trend of thought in the world.

There are also views that the freedom recognized by the bourgeois political groups in the West and libertarians is negative freedom.

They argue that positive liberty actually interferes with the negative liberty of others.Therefore, the bottom line and principle of freedom is to protect the negative freedom of each individual, rather than advocating positive freedom.

They protect citizens' private labor income from infringement, and illegal wealth can be resolved by laws drafted by common decision of the people.The human rights of citizens should be guaranteed inviolable. They advocated that the human rights of political groups in the West, including fascists and Marxists, which are not conducive to the stability of Western society, should also be protected.

The core idea of ​​these people is that "human rights are higher than sovereignty", that is, "loving oneself is equal to loving the country", insisting on humanism and respecting people is now the mainstream trend of thought in the West.

Some other opposition political groups in the West, such as contemporary Marxists, socialists, and Nazism, criticize negative liberty for overemphasizing individual rights, ignoring social rights, and ignoring equality.

They are more inclined to positive freedom, and believe that positive social intervention can achieve equality on a larger scale.In the process of intervention, the rights and interests of individuals are infringed and the freedom of individuals is obliterated.

Power and liberty were concentrated in the hands of rulers.It is generally regarded as totalitarianism.At the same time, these people overemphasized the role of the so-called "leader" in the past, leading to the proliferation of personality worship, which is essentially the revival of the authority of the "emperor" in the old era.

In order to resist the concept of freedom, they absolutize the concept of freedom, believing that absolute freedom does not exist, so they deny the existence and significance of freedom. [

They proposed a philosophical definition of "the kingdom of liberty," referring to an absolute freedom.In fact, absolute freedom does not exist, but relative freedom exists.

"Freedom comes on the premise of not infringing on the freedom of others", which is restricted and conditional.But this limitation does not imply the meaning of the concept of freedom. On the contrary, there is a vast world of freedom beyond the limitation.This is exactly what needs to be protected.

And the advocates are opposed to individual freedom and these free worlds.Because individual freedom will inevitably disintegrate the ruler's rule.Therefore, in the country, freedom is often not widely recognized, and its meaning is deliberately distorted. "

〖∷Update fast∷∷Plain text∷〗