Coquettish Rebirth

However, it was not so easy for Cao Jin to scold Jia Hongjian!At the earliest time, Cao Jin had already noticed that Jia Hongjian and the others mentioned in their so-called "diary" that their films were likely to be scolded.Thinking about it now, Cao Jinna couldn't help but snort coldly, thinking that Jia Hongjian was quite self-aware.However, no matter how self-knowledge it is, it is useless. Those who should be criticized must be criticized!It's just... Jia Hongjian, who is quite self-aware, has already published Cao Jin's criticism routine in the newspaper before. How can Cao Jin and his group criticize Jia Hongjian?

They were originally criticizing others, so they wouldn't go straight to Huanglong like ordinary youths, they wouldn't have anything to say, and they wouldn't just say whatever they didn't like about the other party.As for literati, critics with a sense of art must be tactful!So they have long been used to criticizing people from corners, even if they are clearly disgusted that the political views behind the other party are different from theirs, but they still have to start from the works, and they also have to "present the facts and make sense. "It proves that such a movie or literary work is rubbish, it is a little rubbish that is not as good as it is...not so good.If the literary and artistic level of such a work itself is not enough, then such a work will definitely not be read by many people, and then the problematic political views hidden in this book will not be spread, right?

But the problem is that Jia Hongjian and the others have already exposed their way in advance!Sometimes, the method of criticism of the literati is like magic or tricks.Once it is exposed, once it is said in advance, then the next point will be meaningless, and other "audience" will not treat those "family" who are performing hard on the stage as human beings!This phenomenon even occurs in many cultural performances, such as cross talk.A cross talk actor was preparing to bury his burden and laugh, but just said something, a bastard in the audience stood up suddenly, pointed at the cross talk actor on stage and said, "Hey, this joke I’ve heard it before. He’ll say this and that later. Then what kind of baggage is buried, and how the baggage is shaken in the end, if you don’t believe me, watch it!” When encountering such a thing, if the cross talk actor continues to speak according to the habit.That is really in line with the routine that the second-handers said.As a result, who in the audience still treat cross talk actors as human beings?Who didn't burst out laughing at once.And I still secretly feel that this cross talk actor is not good?

This matter is the biggest problem facing Cao Jin and the others now. To Cao Jin, he is now like that embarrassed comedian on stage.On the one hand, he desperately wanted to break the news about the second-rate youth with an idea.Round the field in this way.But on the other hand, he really couldn't think of a suitable solution for a while!This is how to do?But the good thing is that Cao Jin and the others are just literati and so-called film critics, they are not actors on stage, they are not so urgent, and they don't have to react within a few seconds!

After thinking about it for a few more days, Cao Jin came up with a good solution all at once!Who told him to just play with words?So he hurriedly wrote down such an article, and submitted it to the well-known domestic media that did not deal with Huaxia Hi-Tech - Nan Zhou.So, a week after Jia Hongjian's movie was released, Cao Jin's article was actually published in the new issue of Southern Weekly!In such an article, Cao Jin, a "young writer" and "new film critic", said: "In addition to the so-called entertaining and educational in Jia Hongjian's film, the author finds that he seems to have something different. Of course, it is not impossible, and it can even be said to be very good, to convey to the common people some emotions such as personal life and chance through the entertainment method of movies. There is also a vague tendency to appreciate authoritarianism, and there is still an impulse to bow down and sing to dictators. Jia Hongjian gave Qin Shihuang too much in his movies. In his movies, Qin Shihuang Yingzheng is doing everything for China, and everything is for the country. But this is just a sugar-coated cannonball!"

That's right, Cao Jin felt that since it was impossible to be vague, he should just be explicit and directly attack Jia Hongjian's political views!Although these literati generally don't attack other people's political views, even if they only attack because they are unhappy with other people's political views, political views don't mean they can't attack! "Just like a great man once said, all history is contemporary history. Jia Hongjian made a big mistake in such a movie, that is, subconsciously planting the cynicism of obeying authority. Into the minds of the audience! Jia Hung-chien and his films imply the idea that dictators and authoritarian careerists are justice. Under such a concept, it seems that as long as a dictator says he is The good of the country is for the good of the nation, so everyone should support him, because in this way he is right, even if outsiders attack him as a dictator one after another—and this is exactly in line with Jia Hongjian’s movie. Qin Shihuang's evaluation!"

Perhaps more than 2000 years ago, Qin Shihuang was suitable to be a dictator. After all, Qin Shihuang had his historical progress in that era, but he also had his historical limitations.Today, the background of time and space is completely different. Under such circumstances, should intellectuals in our country still advocate such cynicism?Don’t you see the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin, who massacred and persecuted 10 to 30 Acholi, Ranji and other tribes in the country. Does such a dictator only need to say that he is for the country and the nation? , the Ugandan people must support Idi Amin?Obviously not!

In 1971, Idi Amin had just succeeded in taking power through a military coup, and he was very supportive of the domestic people at the beginning, because in the eyes of the people, Amin was a passionate person who participated in traditional dances with ordinary people And celebrations, choosing wives from different Ugandan tribes to flaunt themselves as nationalists.He even pardoned 55 political prisoners to improve his reputation, although most of the 55 political prisoners were sent to prison by him.Idi Amin then ruled Uganda with an iron fist and high pressure.However, he mostly eliminated potential dissidents through execution and forced exile. All officials who were still loyal to the previous leader were executed. Threats to his rule...

Could it be that according to Jia Hongjian's theory, such a dictator is also worthy of love, respect and assistance?Obviously not!If you are loyal to such a dictator, you will be a sinner of the country and the nation, and you will be an accomplice who helps the tyrant and the tiger!In fact, in modern society, freedom and democracy are the direction of progress for all countries in the world.Only more and more powers are given to the people, so that the people have the power to oppose, this is the standard that a mature and great country should meet..."

Next, this Cao Jinna gave another popular science on human rights, and almost shouted "Human rights are greater than sovereignty"!I almost shouted out that Yan Kingdom is of course qualified to assassinate Qin Shihuang for the sake of the common people in the world, almost shouted out for the sake of the common people in the world, everyone in the world has the right to revolt and rebellion, and everyone has the right to assassinate Qin Shihuang!He even used the later Chen Sheng Wu Guang uprising to criticize Jia Hongjian, thinking that Jia Hongjian's view of history, values ​​and worldview was quite wrong!

After reading such an article, Jia Hongjian really felt...boring enough!Really, do ordinary people have to distinguish the political meaning behind watching a movie?Is it okay to look comfortable?Wouldn't it be enough to have fun watching?If the audience thinks that the main creators are expressing some profound meaning, that's what they came up with, and it has nothing to do with the main creators.Do audiences have to keep up with the class struggle of the 6070s to watch movies?Beware of peaceful evolution all the time?Crazy, is this for entertainment or for struggle?

Therefore, Jia Hongjian felt that after ordinary people saw this kind of article, even if they really read the full text, most of them would still want to go to the cinema to watch this movie!After all, this movie is entertaining!Should a dictator be respected or not? It's not a matter of the audience if it's not good to say?Even if Jia Hongjian praised the dictator, as long as his movie is good-looking, the common people will watch it, what's wrong?It's like an American blockbuster, with less American themes in it?As a result, don't the audience still love to watch it?In the final analysis, this thing is still an entertainment product, not a political book!

Originally, Jia Hongjian didn't want to talk to Cao Jin, but who knew that after Cao Jin's article was published, although the common people didn't seem to have any reaction, some other literati were awakened by Cao Jin's article at once. One by one also learned such a way, and then one by one gave up their original routine, and directly began to criticize the political views behind the movie!Seeing that more and more literati began to publish articles criticizing "Heroes" in various media, and the more they said it, the more explicit it seemed to describe Jia Hongjian as a person who came back from prehistoric times, as if Jia Hongjian belonged to this era The only one that also has the previous historical limitations!

Jia Hongjian felt that he was about to start a fight at this time. Although it seemed that the new routines found by these literati hadn't affected the box office much, but the incident was getting bigger and bigger, and Jia Hongjian and "Heroes" His word of mouth has gradually been polluted, that's not okay!With one breath of life, why let these bastard grandchildren slander us?Why make people so sick of us? (To be continued..)