Coquettish Rebirth

Jia Hongjian used it to criticize Cao Jin’s articles, but to put it bluntly, he used traditional Chinese literati’s method of criticizing others. Such a method is actually the same as Cao Jin’s first method of criticizing Jia Hongjian. of.Such a way is also the consistent routine of traditional Chinese literati.The simple version of this kind of routine is naturally to pick out various details and mistakes in the work. If there are too many details and mistakes, it will appear that such a work itself is not good, and if the work is not good, the ideas in the work are naturally not good.This is a coherent inertial thinking logic.And a further method is the method developed by Chen Lin during the Three Kingdoms period-it doesn't matter to pick mistakes, pick character first!When an enemy's character is in a mess, then what this person does and says is not trustworthy in the eyes of the common people.This method may seem funny, but it is actually very effective for "debating".

This method is also very useful when transferred to modern online debates—for example, when two people discuss each other on the Internet, one person has always been as sanctimonious as Jia Hongjian, and the other person often throws jokes.But what happened in the past has little to do with how it is now.It doesn't mean that Jia Hongjian, who had a good face before, must be right now, nor does it mean that the other person always throws up and rolls around and refuses to admit defeat, so his argument this time must be wrong.However, when Jia Hongjian realized that he might not have the upper hand, he could definitely poach old troubles!By digging up old accounts, we can show that the people who have the upper hand have played around in all kinds of ways in the past, and did not admit defeat in all kinds of ways in the past.By showing and ridiculing this kind of previous style, the onlookers can immediately characterize the "opposite debate friend", and everyone will subconsciously think that this person used to be more unreasonable and unscrupulous.Then you will feel that he is not elegant, and in the end you will look down on him, and subconsciously feel that his judgment is wrong!

This is why Jia Hongjian kept saying that the debate was not to win the opponent, but to win the neutral audience!Because new wine in old bottles, the old way of changing the face to prove the truth by showing character is the same trick for 2000 years.It is especially effective when discussing some issues that are not easy for ordinary people to understand at a glance!So in fact, this matter was exposed by Jia Hongjian in the usual way Cao Jin and others used. They couldn't cause trouble for Jia Hongjian so indirectly, and they couldn't make people feel that Jia Hongjian and the others were looking for various details. The movie has a problem.However, the tactics used by Jia Hongjian have not been exposed, and the most important thing is that there are indeed such mistakes in other people's articles, so Jia Hongjian retaliates with the other way, and uses the other party's tricks to deal with the other party. It really doesn't make people feel that he is criticizing people in the way he has criticized!Because he has something to say!

Except for such a "cynicism".Jia Hongjian still picked a lot of mistakes. For example, "no matter how bad the dictator is, as long as he claims to be good to the country and the nation, the common people will support him." He also criticized it heavily.Regarding this problem, Jia Hongjian said that in such a story in the movie.Qin Shihuang has merits, he can unify the weights and measures, he can unify the writing, he will indeed fight the Xiongnu and conquer Baiyue, this is indeed meritorious.As for other dictators, that is another matter.Jia Hongjian did not discuss a broad topic in the movie "Heroes", not discussing whether all dictators are worthy of help.This kind of problem is not what Jia Hongjian and his films should discuss, it should be the content of the dissertation. Jia Hongjian's film is not a dissertation, but an entertainment product, which only brings entertainment to the audience. As the main creator, he did not and did not Don't want to turn an entertainment movie into a purely academic discussion.And if all kinds of movies have to expand and discuss all kinds of universal political issues, then there are simply no good movies!

Like a movie like Farewell My Concubine.That being said, it is still talking about the fact that the men in the two troupes have a bit of homosexuality. If this is linked to ideology, will it become the promotion of homosexuality in this film?Are you "reversing the verdict" on homosexuality?Even the so-called literary works of a writer like Cao Jin, if you really want to find faults, can you really find faults at all?It is really necessary to pick out various ideological issues. What if various political issues are picked out?

After such an article came out, it really made many Jia Hongjian's supporters applaud!Even in the eyes of the general public.Jia Hongjian's articles are pretty good—to put it bluntly, how many people these days have come from the stricter era?Who hasn't experienced the matter of being in command of politics?As a result, what Cao Jin is doing now, this tactic of picking the wrong one looks like the tactic of that era, no matter how you look at it, it is still engaged in class struggle!Such an approach is something that everyone has long been tired of!What age is this?Reform and opening up have been carried out a long time ago, and the focus has been shifted to economic construction long ago, so why can't we have a good time of entertainment, why can't we not let politics take command?

On the other side, after Cao Jin read this article, he was so choked that he could hardly speak!He is such a literary and artistic worker, it is said that he is still a writer, how could he be picked on by Jia Hongjian, a semi-professional literary and artistic worker?He, Cao Jin, wrote an article criticizing others, but in the end, others picked out a series of faults such as wrong words and so on. This is simply a slap in the face!After reading this article, Cao Jin's face was burning hot at that time, as if he had really been slapped by Jia Hongjian!Under such circumstances, can Cao Jin still have the face to continue writing articles?Of course there is!Is Cao Jin such a thin-skinned person?After he was slapped in the face by Jia Hongjian, he felt all kinds of irritated at that time, okay? He still has to fight Jia Hongjian!He still doesn't believe it, a film critic like him can't be a film producer?

What Cao Jin didn't realize at all was that Chinese film critics are actually not very powerful, and their influence is not so great that a single article can affect a movie's box office by a certain percentage.If you say that they are scolding by a group of people, it may slightly reduce the box office, but if you say that this movie cannot be sold, it is very unlikely - just like "Heroes" in history, it would be miserable to be scolded Well, as a result, wasn't the box office pretty good back then?The reason why Jia Hongjian chose to respond was that he wanted to earn more box office on the basis of the 2.5 million box office of "Hero" in history, so he responded.But now that he responded like this, it was obvious that he had the upper hand. Cao Jin and the others didn't have much influence in the first place, so how could they win back?Can it still make the box office crazy?

Just as Cao Jin and the others were contemplating the issue, Jia Hongjian's real counterattack came.I saw an article published in a series of domestic provincial newspapers such as "Yangtze Evening News" a few days later. The power of this article is too great when it comes out!Who wrote this article?It was written by many people!Such an article was written by Jia Hongjian after he specially recruited a group of directors and producers in the United States to help write film reviews, and let them off in private!In addition to such American directors and producers, there are judges from the Cannes Film Festival and the Venice Film Festival in Europe, who also wrote a short article to comment on such a movie.In such an article, Spielberg is very optimistic about such a film by Jia Hongjian.So in such a film review from abroad, Spielberg really appreciates such a film, but what he appreciates is not purely from the perspective of film techniques, but from the political level!

"In my personal opinion, such a film actually provides very interesting ideas. As we all know, Churchill once said that democracy is only the least bad system, not the best system. Under dictatorship, the country is not impossible Wealthy and strong. Even in modern society, Saudi Arabia is still a monarchy, but they are also very rich and powerful. So if such a movie is to discuss pan-politicization, I personally think that it is actually a move toward democracy as a whole in the world today. A more beneficial reflection on the route can make people stop and think about whether democracy is really good. If it is true, then it can go one step further. From this point of view, this movie is still very interesting and very interesting. Good. Of course, this is just a literary work after all, so there shouldn’t be too many political interpretations..."

Spielberg said it, and so did other big names.An Oscar winner like Tom Hanks feels that "Hero" should not be discussed too much politically. He personally thinks "Hero" is very good, and he looks forward to the day when Jia Hongjian will bring such a film to the United States. When it is released, I believe it will do well at the box office in the United States.Basically, when Jia Hongjian invited these people to comment on a film such as "Hero", they mainly made positive affirmations, and everyone was very optimistic about the future of this film.Even if they don't agree with dictatorship, they at least think that such a film is worth thinking about and should not be interpreted too much politically!

What does Jia Hongjian mean by such an article?Why did he bring his films to Europe and the United States to be commented by many film critics and celebrities in the film industry?It is because he knows that many people in China subconsciously worship foreigners!I also think that the things that the foreign adults have recognized are good things!Under such circumstances, Master Yang directly said that Jia Hongjian's movie was ready, would Cao Jin and others dare to speak?Which of them has a Spielberg bull?Who has the judges of the Cannes Film Festival and the Venice Film Festival?No one is a cow, you still say gross?Still picking burrs?What if he really thought he was a wolf with a big tail?

With such a slap, Jia Hongjian slapped those people hard on the face!