Coquettish Rebirth

How?Although he didn't know exactly how the two brothers dealt with Jia Hongjian, but in his opinion, there were two ways to deal with it.The first one is to hack the entire movie and launch an attack on such a movie in public opinion.For example, the attack on such a topic as euthanasia, through the attack on what is advocated at the core of such a movie, makes the whole movie seem untenable!And the second one is to go to the main creators of the movie!For example, go for the director, for the protagonist, for a real person who is a real person!It's like the news that Polanski was a rapist was dug up in the United States in an instant after the Oscars gave Polanski an award!

At that time, Polanski broke the news after the vote. If the news was revealed before the vote and copied in the United States, then Polanski might not be able to win the award!After all, it's really not something that everyone can do!Many times, even the Oscar judges feel that they are right and wrong, but it is really possible that the psychological balance is slightly affected by public opinion without knowing it!After all, voting is still very subjective in many cases!

But having said that, although Jia Hongjian did not participate in the two brothers' pranking activities, relying on his ingenuity, he soon discovered that it was not easy to hack a movie like "Deep Sea Sleep".For this reason, he only found out after consulting a lot of information-although it was not his business, but in case he had to face such a thing in the future, he secretly simulated and tried to make himself What should I do if I come to do this, and then I found out that this thing is really difficult to handle!Why is it difficult?Because in fact, since the 30s, Europe and the United States have mentioned euthanasia one after another!This euthanasia is not a new phenomenon that came out after 2000, but it really has decades of history in the Western world!

As early as around 1935, before the outbreak of World War II in Europe.Regardless of whether it is Germany or the United Kingdom or France, it is the beginning of social discussion on whether euthanasia is good or not.Although at that time the European and American governments said that this thing was too easy to be linked to murder, they were unwilling to pass it.But for decades, people who support euthanasia have tried their best.How to think of a way?Didn't the government say they were afraid of being linked to murder?Then let's propose a law stipulating that only dying people with irreversible serious illnesses can be euthanized, how about that?Then, in order to prevent others from violating the patient's opinion and killing a seriously ill patient who is in a coma or unable to express his opinion, it is stipulated that the patient can only sign for euthanasia when the patient is awake, can't it?If you are afraid that someone will forge documents or something, you need to have a third party as a witness or a probate lawyer to testify.This is the head office, right?

So after so many decades of accumulation, foreign countries have really reached the verge of euthanasia being approved!Because at least from a legal point of view, there are no obstacles.And such a thing, after decades of development, has basically been accepted by Europeans and Americans along with "homosexuality".So even if Europe and the United States have not approved euthanasia, the general public opinion of the common people thinks it can be passed!Under such a situation, picking on the fault of such a movie, such as the theme of euthanasia, obviously has no way out!This is like saying that homosexuality is wrong in Europe and the United States in such an era, and heterosexuality is the choice that everyone should choose.This is simply a "reactionary" like turning back the clock on history!

Therefore, if there is a problem with the thinking shown in the movie, it is said that the protagonist should not give up his life.Should be more courageous and fight hard "not disabled physically and mentally"... that really doesn't affect the word-of-mouth and evaluation of the film, because others will say that not everyone has this kind of courage. Does this world not allow others to be cowardly? Is it?Yes, people who can bravely live after being disabled are very remarkable, but are people who want to live and die after being disabled a heinous crime?He was only able to move from the neck up, and how much torture did he bring to himself and his relatives after being paralyzed for 30 years?After his parents are gone, will he rely on his brother and sister-in-law to serve him for the rest of his life?Brother and sister-in-law are gone?By nephew?Isn't this a just like a drag oil bottle?It's good to be able to fight hard, but people don't fight hard.This is also the freedom of others, right?You can't force people to live in such a miserable way, can you?What's the difference between that and punishing others?So at least in Europe and the United States, there is really no way to pick such a problem with the general direction of the film!

So what can we do?That is the second article!Let's find trouble with various creators!For example, the director's... black history?How, for example, does the director himself fail?Or maybe the actors didn't play well?It can even be said that the roles played by the actors are different from the real people in real life?right!This can be used!One of the selling points of such a movie is the adaptation of real events.And real people adapted such a movie.Of course, it can be more attractive in terms of publicity, after letting the audience watch the movie.It can indeed shock the audience even more.But what if such a real-life movie is kicked out and said that the protagonist is not like a real protagonist at all?What if he played too hard or something?

After all, this is a movie, not something that simply touches people's hearts!After all, this film is participating in the Oscars, which is a competition to evaluate movies, not a film festival to judge whether movies are touching or not!So in such a situation, as a movie, the characters in this movie are not really played, the changes are too big, and then the actors don’t play well, that can really bring a lot to the overall quality of the movie. big impact!And don't forget, while such a hacking of other people's movies, we can also do things here!That can also be slandered on the phone in various canvasses!So as long as those members of the neutral faction who sit on the wall have a reason, a reason for them not to vote, maybe their votes can be snatched!

Jia Hongjian thought of this, and sure enough, within a few days, the Weinstein brothers did something similar to Jia Hongjian's plan—all of a sudden, I heard that the tabloids in the UK suddenly interviewed the helpers in history. A woman who "committed suicide" with her boyfriend who had been paralyzed for 30 years was arrested by the police and charged with murder!Later, due to various reasons, the court did not convict her, and she was acquitted.Such a person can be said to be closely related to the prototype of the protagonist in the movie, right?Then the tabloid interviewed such a woman. I don’t know how to ask questions and induce them. Anyway, the woman said, "The actor acting like this is completely different from Romon"!

Romon is the prototype of the protagonist of such a movie. When Romon's girlfriend said that the lead actor was not good enough and picked out a lot of problems, such a news was quickly reprinted and reported by the American media!All of a sudden, the American media rushed to report like crazy!After all, this is big news in the entertainment industry!And when such a news spread wildly in the United States, the Weinstein brothers were not idle. He arranged for Cecilia Cheung and Nicholas Tse to call various members every day, and even the Weinstein brothers also called personally. Call various members.When they were on the phone, they were talking about how good their films were and how well their performances were.In this way, even if they didn't really speak out to slander their competitors' movies, the final effect was almost achieved!Weakened the enemy's arrogance, and then went to win over the disappearing arrogance of the opponent.Such an approach worked really well. In the trade union award selection after the first round of Oscar voting, the vote rate of "Deep Sea Sleep" really dropped a lot!And the reduced turnout rate, it really all went to "The Promise"!

It took about two weeks. When the trade union awards began to announce the awards, although "The Promise" did not win the award for the best foreign language film, "Deep Sea Sleep", which had always been far ahead in the number of votes, did. Turnout was much lower!From such a point of view, under the operation of the Weinstein brothers, such a black film has really begun to decline, while the votes of "The Promise" have further improved, and finally it has changed in the union awards. Became "The Promise" was nominated for the Union Award as No.5!As we all know, the relationship between the trade union award and the Oscar is very important!Although "Deep Sea Eternal Sleep" has been criticized in terms of ideology and a series of other things, although it seems that "Deep Sea Eternal Sleep" has a higher vote rate than "The Promise", but such a black general competitor is just right. Children's eight classics have begun!After another two weeks, the Oscars will start the second round of selection.As expected, the number of votes for "Deep Sea Eternal Sleep" has dropped a lot, and now they have tied for third place with "The Promise".

This also means that it is very useful to pull people back as a whole, and the number of votes for such a "Deep Sea Eternal Sleep" has dropped a lot, and it may affect the Oscar voting results in the future!As for the trade union award, "The Promise" finally entered the nomination list for the trade union award, and the gap with "Deep Sea Sleep" is really not that big!Maybe we can get some tickets from other people before the Oscar voting! (to be continued)