Research starts with PhD students

Chapter 167 How many Nobel Prizes is it worth? Zhang Shuo: This kind of research is meaningless!
Zhang Shuo finally chose to submit his paper to JHEP, the Journal of High Energy Physics under the Organization for the Advancement of Nuclear Research.

This is a study on the analysis of data from particle collision experiments. It will be easier to publish if the paper is submitted to JHEP, a relevant journal in the field.

If it were other physics magazines, it might take a long review period, because in the field of international physics, it is difficult to say his personal influence. Some people recognize it, but some do not.

After completing the submission, Zhang Shuo felt relieved.

He continued his research on the NS equations and also found time to offer an open class in theoretical physics, which talked about the basic models and expression problems of mechanics. The course received a lot of attention in the school, and like the last time, the classroom was filled with students who came to attend the class.

After completing the course, half of the semester's teaching work is over.

This is a privilege from the school.

The most watched experiment after the New Year was a new experiment at the Institute of High Energy Physics. Some people from the school were going to participate in the experiment, including Luo Yongjun.

Zhang Shuo also planned to go to the experimental base of the Institute of High Energy Physics, but he did not plan to participate in the experimental work immediately. He would go there in the next few days. The experiment attracted attention because of the discovery of the CP group.

Therefore, the experimental work of the cp group is the focus.

Zhang Shuo is very confident about the experiment. The deviation of particle motion discovered by the Cp group is by no means accidental. Such a clear signal, coupled with the confirmation of the system mission, means that there will be discoveries in every experiment.

The current experiment is more intense than the last one, so the signal will naturally be clearer.

The difference between this experiment and the last one is that the Nuclear Organization sent a working group to participate in the experiment.

If a clear signal of particle motion deviation is discovered again, the two institutions will release the experimental results at the same time, which is equivalent to reaffirming the new discovery, and the phenomenon can be basically confirmed.

However, more physicists who did not participate in the experimental work paid more attention to the large-scale experimental deviation analysis data released by the Computing Center of the Institute of High Energy Physics.

The newly discovered signal of the Cp group is clear, but the data are all on the surface. The experimental data of hyperon decay is too single, and the movement, radiation, energy, etc. of the particles are all fixed, which makes it impossible to conduct research from the perspective of data analysis.

Particle collision experiments are different. There are many parameters and a rich variety of escaped particles. Even now, some teams can still discover something new from particle collision experiment data.

In this way, we can analyze the experimental deviation results and use data analysis and theoretical perspectives to study why energy differences and deviations from simulations occur in the experiment.

Just like the situation of online public opinion, half a month later, many new theoretical studies have been published.

Most of the theoretical research is meaningless and hard to believe at first glance. The mathematical systems constructed are mostly settings rather than real derivations.

These studies are all published in physics journals with less influence, and very few theories are published in top journals.

The review process of top journals is very strict.

In the research direction of deviation analysis data for large-scale particle collision experiments, only those studies with rigorous mathematical logic and recognized by top physicists can be published in top journals.

The journal Science Physics published a related theoretical study, which brought the greatest impact in the past month. The author is Professor Isaac Rees of the University of Pennsylvania.

Isaac Rees is a theoretical physicist of some fame. He has been committed to the research of antimatter and dark matter, and has been demonstrating the direction of mathematical expression of string theory.

In the international physics community, it is a great achievement for a scholar in pure theoretical physics to achieve "some fame".

One reason is that theoretical physics is often not taken seriously, especially in recent years. Without new theoretical research and demonstration, it is difficult to achieve any major results based on previously accumulated research.

In addition, the results of theoretical physics cannot be verified and are just some mathematical expressions. The analysis of deep-level physical phenomena is difficult to attract attention. It can even be said that it is completely out of touch with the general public.

Isaac Reese was awarded a tenured professorship at Royal Roads University of Pennsylvania based on his purely theoretical research, which is quite remarkable.

The reason why Isaac Riess's work was published in the journal Science Physics is, on the one hand, because its mathematical arguments are relatively detailed and its expression is related to some existing physical content.

On the other hand, his research results are shocking.

Isaac Rees believes that the energy loss in particle collision experiments and the deviation between experiments and simulations are the same phenomenon as the particle motion deviation found in strong magnetic interference hyperon decay experiments.

The reason is the manifestation of baryon CP violation in particle experiments.

This conclusion is very shocking.

Isaac Rees was interviewed after publishing the paper. He said with a confident smile, "The particle collision experiment and the strong magnetic interference superon decay experiment have one thing in common: they are both in a strong magnetic environment."

"This extremely special environment may be related to the very beginning of the universe, when a large amount of CP violation occurred, with matter and antimatter annihilating each other, leaving behind a large amount of matter."

"The current particle collision experiment simulates the collision of particles at the microscopic level. Under a strong magnetic environment, the state of the particles is very close to that at the beginning of the universe."

"Whether it is the particle control experiment or the strong word interference operation decay, the unknown phenomena discovered are consistent, and they are all concrete manifestations of baryon CP violation."

“This is undoubtedly a great discovery.”

"The discovery of these two unknown phenomena has given us clear evidence of the existence of CP violation..."

Isaac Rees has been talking a lot to explain his theory. He believes that the unknown phenomenon is caused by the creation of baryon CP destruction.

Of course, he not only expressed his own views, but also published research papers with beautiful mathematics, which were related to the standard model of particles and the supersymmetry arguments of string theory.

When the research and interviews were reported, they immediately caused a sensation in the international physics community.

……

The international physics community is paying close attention to the data research released by the Computing Center of the Institute of High Energy Physics, and the domestic community is naturally paying close attention to it as well.

Isaac Reese's research was also reported by domestic media.

Many people couldn't help but discuss it. "CP destruction? It's really possible! CP destruction is a perfect explanation."

“That’s absolutely the best answer!”

"Both phenomena are caused by CP violation. We can use this as a breakthrough to study the CP violation problem. Can it be turned into an applied technology in the future?"

"Is what he said right? I still think this answer is too perfect..."

Zhang Shuo also saw the media reports. He was a little surprised, then downloaded the paper and took a look. He couldn't help laughing.

He was very surprised.

In the past, some scholars explained the deviation problems in particle collision experiments as CP violation. The related research was popular for two months, but was later directly disproven.

Now we have it, and the paper has been published in a top journal.

"Isaac Reese?"

"The names of the authors of the papers are different, but the theories are very similar. All the mathematical settings and constructions are aimed at proving that the unknown phenomenon is caused by CP violation."

"From the result to the process..."

"This Reese is really good!"

General research is to deduce bit by bit, and finally look at the derived mathematical expression and then analyze what it is specifically.

Isaac Reese initially believed that it was a CP violation, and directly used the results to reverse the process. When there were missing parts in the process, he simply created the settings himself and completed the research.

This kind of research is almost meaningless.

The reason why many people can't see it is that Isaac Riess's research is very complicated and involves the argument of supersymmetry in string theory. If you are not a professional in theoretical physics research, it is not easy to understand the process.

Zhang Shuo was able to make this judgment directly because he had been exposed to similar research and even read similar papers.

After reading the paper, he didn't care. Similar research in the past was disproven in two months, and the experiment at the Institute of High Energy Physics is still going on. All they need to do is measure a few more data points in the experiment to confirm that it is not CP violation.

International theoretical physicists will certainly have doubts about the research, and after in-depth research, they will deny the research.

Zhang Shuo looked at the news again, then opened his Weibo account and found several comments talking about Isaac Reese's research.

To sum up, what do you think of Isaac Reese's research conclusions?

One of the messages was from a professor at Capital University, who simply replied, "Made-up math."

"Don't worry about it. He first determined that it was CP destruction, and then worked it out."

"Many new settings appear at key derivation points, and you can see them if you study them carefully."

After Zhang Shuo replied, he continued to browse his phone. Not long after, he found a new reply, "Professor Zhang Shuo, how did you make this judgment? I think the mathematical expression in Isaac Rees's research is very clear and logically rigorous, and the analysis is based on experimental data and some physical theories..."

"Ula Ula..."

There is a series of content behind this.

Zhang Shuo didn't want to read on. He glanced at the account that replied and found that it seemed a little familiar.

Doctor Novelty?

This account seems to be impressive?

Zhang Shuo thought for a moment and responded, "You want to discuss math with me again?"

Dr. Xinqi responded very quickly, and immediately typed a series of content, "Professor Zhang Shuo, you are a most professional mathematician, and you have made great achievements in theoretical physics.

"But Professor Isaac Rees is also an expert in the field of theoretical physics. His research was published in the physics journal Science and is already recognized research."

"Many experts in the field of theoretical physics recognize his research..."

"Ula Ula..."

Zhang Shuo couldn't bear to watch it anymore, so he simply replied, "Everyone has different opinions."

"Some people still believe that the earth is flat and the sky is round. I can't convince them, and they can't convince me anyway."

"If you firmly believe your point of view is correct, then go ahead, but please don't try to convince me, thank you."

After sending the message, he blocked the other party directly.

opposite.

'Dr. Novelty' Yang Chao looked at the reply message and gnashed his teeth in anger. The tone of the reply was very polite, but the content felt like a mockery of himself. The sky is round and the earth is square?
"I'm a science blogger, how can I use the example of the earth being round and the sky being square? It should be at least at the level of string theory..."

"Do you think I'm a fool?"

Zhang Shuo was in no mood to say anything more to this inexplicable netizen.

Isaac Rees' research is indeed very advanced, so advanced that it is not easy for scholars in theoretical physics to find problems in it.

At the same time, his theory can be said to be a perfect explanation for unknown phenomena - there is no need to introduce new physics, it can be analyzed with the original physics, and it is also a major discovery.

CP destruction is beyond the description of the Nobel Prize.

Discoveries of this level can drive people crazy, and that's what the Institute of High Energy Physics' Computing Center is like.

Cui Kaiwen called and excitedly talked about Isaac Reese's research, "Zhang Shuo, have you seen this research? It's a CP buster!"

"We discovered CP violation through experimental analysis and revealed the rules of the formation of primordial matter in the universe!"

“If his research is true, will we get a Nobel Prize for it?”

Zhang Shuo hesitated for a moment and replied, "Maybe."

"Do many people believe this research? I mean the group center or the physical center."

"Of course, we all hope it's true."

Kevin Cui said this with great certainty because he felt that the Nobel Prize in Physics was beckoning to him and he was one of the people who discovered unknown physical phenomena.

How many Nobel Prizes is CP destruction worth?
They are unknown physical phenomena, and the person who discovered them should also win the Nobel Prize, right?
Zhang Shuo was silent for a while, then asked, "Do you think the discovery of CP violation is more important, or a new discovery that can open the door to a new physical world?"

"What do you mean?"

"I'm asking you which discovery you prefer? Do you hope that the unknown phenomenon is a completely new kind of physics, or do you hope that it is CP violation?"

Cui Kevin thought for a moment and fell silent.

Unknown phenomena are a completely new type of physics, and their application and research must be more important than CP violation.

Cp destruction is just a phenomenon; the new physics represents a large research field.

The latter is no worse than the former.

Zhang Shuo continued, "Of course, no matter how you look at it, it won't affect what it is. I'm very sure that Reese's research is meaningless, and the unknown phenomenon is not CP violation."

"This is a completely new phenomenon. To be more precise, it is a chaos field. I have talked about this issue before."

After hanging up the phone, Zhang Shuo had a better understanding of the influence of Isaac Reese's research.

Cp destruction is the perfect explanation for unknown phenomena.

The team discovering the unknown phenomenon, namely the Physics Center and Computing Center of the Institute of High Energy Physics, hopes to discover CP violation.

Unknown phenomena may represent a completely new direction in physics, but they are only possibilities. Cp violation is a definite major achievement, so major that it is even unimaginable. Some people have begun to fantasize about winning the Nobel Prize.

In the field of theoretical physics, including scholars of string theory, there must be many people who also hope that it is CP violation, because Isaac Riess used the argument of supersymmetry in his argument.

This also means that part of the string theory has been confirmed.

Many other unrelated scholars will also believe it. One reason is that Isaac Rees is somewhat famous and his paper was published in the journal Science Physics. In addition, CP violation does not require the introduction of new physics and is relatively easy to understand, which also proves the correctness of the cutting-edge physics direction.

and many more.

In short, the academic community generally holds a positive attitude towards Isaac Reese's research.

"If I prove Isaac Reese wrong, wouldn't that be a bit of a spoiler?"

Zhang Shuo was thinking with a smile on his face, "If Isaac Reese is right, the whole world will be satisfied. If he is proven wrong, no one will be satisfied..."

"Oh~~~"

After thinking it over, he decided to post a Weibo post, publicly responding to those who had questions and expressing his own opinion, "I read the paper."

"Isaac Reese's research is to infer the process from the results. This kind of research is meaningless."

(End of this chapter)