Reborn I am the second generation of stars

Chapter 1294

According to a tt news report: "After the movie premiered nationwide, Douban's score was only 2.0. As of 16:30 on the day of the premiere, it showed 100% one star. According to Douban's scoring mechanism, registered users can give a movie a one-star rating. Ratings from one star to five stars, one to five stars are converted to 0 to 10 points, and the scores of all users are added up and then divided by the number of users to get the score. This also means that "2.0 points" is the lowest score that can be scored on Douban. "Showbiz" hit the lowest score record on Douban as soon as it was released.

"On the day of the premiere, the producer of the film "Dream Chasing Showbiz", Yanjing Shichuan Chuang Culture Media Co., Ltd. under the name of Director Bi, said that many studio managers would set the number of film schedules and time slots based on Douban's scores. According to reports, a film investor who came to Cangzhou once told Director Bi that he went to the largest cinema in Cangzhou to watch "Dream Chasing Showbiz", but he couldn't find the film schedule. After Bi Chenggong asked the director of the film studio, he was told: The Douban score of this movie is only 2.0, and the originally scheduled screening was cancelled."

"The film crew also stated that the film took 10 years to create, with an investment of up to 5000 million yuan. It was highly praised by many experts in the expert viewing seminars, but encountered the suspected event of Douban's "locking score 2.0", "a young director spends Ten years of painstaking efforts to make movies for China, was ruined by Douban in one day!!!”

"Four days after "Dream Chasing Showbiz" was released, it was urgently withdrawn on May 4. After negotiating with Douban, it has not received a formal and detailed reply. On May 5, director Bi Chenggong posted an article on the Internet, stating that he has formally sued Douban , and claim 4 yuan.

"On May 5th, Douban Films issued a counterattack and released a complaint on its official Weibo account, suing Bi Chenggong and Shichuan Chuang Company under his name in court. The official account published several articles slandering Douban Movies for manipulating ratings, seriously infringing Douban Movies’ reputation rights, and demanded that the defendant immediately delete the infringing articles, apologize, and bear the plaintiff’s litigation costs of 5 yuan.”

Everyone in the circle was stunned.

What kind of shit is this?

The two sides insisted on their own opinions.

The plaintiff, Shi Chuan Chuang, said that "Dream Chasing Showbiz" was locked by Douban Technology Co., Ltd. for 16 consecutive hours on the day of its domestic release, and the Douban platform was locked with a score of 2.0. Mistaken as a "very bad director", theaters refused to schedule films or reduced their schedules, the public did not watch them, and there were a lot of rumors and slanders, which led to the film being forced to withdraw on May 20th, [-], causing serious damage to Shi Chuan Chuang. Huge economic loss and reputation damage.

Shi Chuan Chuang said that the above-mentioned films and directors were continuously and maliciously attacked on the Douban platform, and most of the comments and scores appeared after the film was withdrawn. A film with a box office of less than 1000 million has more than 4 comments on the Douban platform, and most of the comments stated are inconsistent with the facts, which greatly misled the public and seriously violated the company's reputation rights. At the same time, many online comments Those who spread rumors and slandered the above-mentioned films and personnel with insulting language, Douwang Company, as the platform manager, failed to fulfill its duty of careful review and management, and seriously violated the legitimate rights and interests of Shichuanchuang Company.

For this reason, Shichuanchuang Company requires Douwang to make a public written apology, publish an announcement on Douban.com and its official Weibo platform, eliminate the influence, and restore its reputation; immediately delete all false comments about the above-mentioned film and stop the infringement.

Douban claims that there is no illegal act, Douban’s film ratings are dynamically changing, and there is no locking mechanism in the scoring mechanism, and the ratings of the films involved in the case have never been locked.

Moreover, the ratings and comments of the film involved in the case are based on netizens’ own evaluations of the film, which are the result of user behavior, not the behavior of Douwang. The plaintiff has no evidence to prove that the decrease in social evaluation or the infringement of reputation is related to and caused by the defendant. The scheduling and withdrawal of the film involved in the case has nothing to do with Douwang, and the plaintiff's claim is requested to be dismissed.

Douwang submitted evidence that, except for Douban users, most of the public believed that the quality of the film involved was not high; 1.0, a low rating.

Many evaluations of the film involved in the case on the Internet are relatively low, such as: the article published on the scarf "I went to the cinema to watch "Dream Chasing Showbiz" to observe human beings."

Douwang believes that there is no causal relationship between the withdrawal of the film and the ratings and comments on Douban.

As for the situation of "I gave the film five stars, but the rating has not changed", it is because the scoring behavior is judged to be an abnormal rating, or the rating change value is too small to be displayed. The change from 2.0 to 2.7 is a system update data. It is normal.

As for the occurrence of 'no rating', it is temporarily closed due to a large number of abnormal ratings and the negotiation information received from the plaintiff. Douban stated that Douban Movies uses a simple arithmetic mean to calculate the total score in the form of "one person, one vote". The system determines that it is manipulation, trolling, illegal comments, ratings that are not within the validity period (mainly before the public screening), and insufficient user account credit.

This is really a fight between gods. Bi Chenggong and Bi Dao's operation is called "touch porcelain marketing", and this kind of marketing can be said to be unprecedented.

Director Bi also came out to refute the rumors in person.

"100% one star is simply impossible, it is unprecedented, it is completely false display, I think 2.0 is actually an insult to us."

Bi Cheng said.

In an interview with Yanjing reporter, Bi Chenggong said that he originally expected the score to be not high, "My own expectation is around 4 points, and more than 3 points may be acceptable, but the score of 2.0 on the premiere day, others told me This is equal to zero points. This lawsuit does not mean that our movies are good, there must be a lot of improvement, but our movies are certainly not the worst movies, but our score is the lowest."

He said that no one would be willing to cooperate with someone who bears the title of "worst film director". Douban's ratings do have a great impact on movies. If Douban can clarify in time, many rumors may not exist.

"Now when you search for my name or the name of a movie on the Internet, the associated words are 'very bad director', 'very bad movie', 'Bi Chenggong is the stupid son of a landlord', and I am 'mentally retarded',' Crazy, "Such a person can go to Yanda", and the insult to the creative team are all negative, causing a lot of harm. Moreover, no one would want to be with a "worst film director" 'cooperate."

Bi Chenggong said that whether this lawsuit is for himself or for more people in the industry, he hopes to have a more reasonable and fair platform for creators and audiences to interact better.

Netizens and even all the media didn’t buy it. It’s because Bi Chenggong was too arrogant, and his words and deeds were inconsistent. It was said before that this movie is an unprecedented masterpiece, but what about now?He also said that it would be nice to get four points.

This is simply slapping yourself in the face.

It's not over yet.

He also wrote a letter to the Film Bureau, this letter is called "My Letter to the National Film Bureau".

In the letter, Director Bi bluntly stated that he had experienced an absurd and frightening event in the film industry. He said that "Dream Chasing the Showbiz", which he had created for ten years, was locked by Douban as the first day of its release. 2.0 points (the lowest score), and lasted for 16 hours, and I also questioned Douban, but was slandered, causing myself to become "the worst director in history", and the filming was also greatly reduced.

Director Bi believes that Douban, as the largest film review website in China, has some behaviors such as trolling and scoring. Not only has he been slandered, but also filmmakers and leading experts related to the film have also been discredited.

Director Bi repeatedly emphasized: "The most terrifying thing is Douban's powerful control over the Chinese film review industry and online public opinion, and its ability to influence and kidnap ordinary people's judgments is shocking." He also revealed that Douban is a wholly foreign-owned enterprise, Under the guise of democracy and freedom, he has many connections with overseas capital. Finally, Director Bi asked the National Film Administration to thoroughly investigate the unfair scoring incident on Douban.com and severely crack down on the "Internet Film Critics Triad Organization".

Director Bi's operation made everyone extremely astonished. On the cusp of this storm, he not only did not keep a low profile, but faced up to difficulties. What kind of spirit is this?
The well-known public intellectual Ajie said: "This is a typical representative of the class leader type of good students educated in our country. If you have anything to do, you have to go to the teacher, find the organization, and criticize these bad students. Thinking about it now, I really shudder. "

Director Chen Beixuan also commented: "It is understandable to promote your own film and strive for higher commercial returns, but every time you say that you have been hacked and bullied, you will always attract a bunch of unknown onlookers and hijack public opinion. A bit of a rascal who acts like a baby and asks for candies."

"And selling justice is what I hate the most, that is, people's selfish desires disguise themselves in the name of the country, elevating their own criticisms to slandering the industry, taking things out of context and making things out of nothing, which is far worse than ideology's attack on terror."

"Every time I see these hoarse "nationalism", I can't help but ask, in your eyes, Chinese films and young Chinese directors are so vulnerable? If the media is so bad, then who is trying to stand up? "Those Years", "Infernal Affairs", and even "The King of Comedy" and other good stories.

To loudly instigate "nationalism" knowingly, that is either stupid or bad. "

"The director of this film is also very simple, very persistent, and very interesting. This makes me think that people should eliminate distractions to make movies. I want to maintain this point. If you say that you just want to make money to make movies, that's okay, and Hollywood does too. It’s fun to play like this, but you can’t say it nicely. It’s quite boring.

That's the real honesty.

There is no shame in business.

It is shameful to have slick business.

Making bad movies isn't that bad either.

It's really fucking bad to make a bad movie and still not admit it, and slander other people's motives for saying it is bad.

Before killing your heart, you might as well ask yourself your original heart.

For example, let’s take [-] million at the box office on the first day. "

Everyone was amazed.

"Damn it, Mr. Beixuan is awesome."

"When will Mr. Beixuan join Xu Qian?"

"This is the so-called son Shi Wushuang."

"There was a slap in the face."

"When will Mr. Beixuan wear a pair of pants with Xu Qian?"

. . . . . . . . . . .

Wang Pingzhi commented, "Today's Chinese film critics are not much better than Chinese films, cheating, accusing, coquettish, and airing. From the closed correctness, I always believe in the freedom of chaos. At first, praise is praise, and criticism is criticism. Later, praise is praise, and criticism is objective criticism. Later, criticism is not allowed, and you can only praise. Finally, Only if you don't praise according to the fixed format, you are criticizing. Is this far away? Look at this, in our impression, we thought that the voice of Pengci was the voice of people fighting against each other, but today's movie circle tells us that the voice of Pengci , maybe there is no sound."

"That is nice."

"This sentence is very good. Compared with closed correctness, I always believe in the freedom of chaos. At first, praise is praise, and criticism is criticism. Later, praise is praise, and criticism is objective criticism. Later, criticism is not Allowed, you can only praise, in the end, as long as you do not praise according to the fixed format, you are criticizing."

"Yes, the lessons learned from the past are not far away."

"Director Wang's comments really hit the nail on the head."

"Director Wang deserves to be Director Wang, with profound insights."

"aweason."

. . . . . . . . . . .

Filmmaker Zhang Hao commented:

"No class, organization, or social institution is single-level. The entertainment industry is only under the focus of society, and it is also a vanity fair, which makes most ordinary people feel chaotic. When you are a director, I am sorry. , Judging by the level of your film, you are not worthy of being called a director. Using this kind of character analysis at the level of a junior high school student to talk about such a big topic one-sidedly, I am sorry that you really don’t know the entertainment industry. The level is at the same level as the uncle who picks his feet at home and watches the news broadcast every day, it's really ridiculous."

"Some people call the experimental films made by the great doctor, art films, we can't understand them, but most contemporary films belong to the category of art for commerce, not fine art, not painting and writing novels, a pen is enough for you, you The film consumes a lot of social resources. If you are really a so-called experimental film, please respect Fine Art and spit out the 5000 million investors. If you really think that you are devoted to art, please don’t give you negative comments from the audience. When the line was withdrawn, I came to cry at the box office, and I was a clown in every word and deed."

Everyone commented:
"You're right."

"It's so good, it really touched my heart."

"It makes sense, I think it makes a lot of sense."

"Generally, directors who make bad movies try not to pay attention to online reviews. You can scold as you like, and make a fortune in silence. If you can't help it, you will find a few film critics to threaten and send a lawyer's letter or something. But you are not the People's Daily, and you dare to directly attack Douban, which completely subverts my three views."

"Is it interesting? Whether a film is good or bad is decided by everyone or by a group of so-called experts? Do you want to please the general audience or those "experts" with a film? You still fight with netizens every now and then. I really feel your public relations. The strategy is very low."

"Haha, success is bad."

. . . . . . . . . . . .

What do you mean when the wall falls and everyone pushes it?

This is.

How glorious and majestic Bi Chenggong was before, how aggrieved and dispirited he is now.

He thought he could become a god, he thought he could challenge Xu Qian's peerless status, but he didn't think that he would just become a joke for others.

"The King of Comedy" is exactly the opposite of "Dream Chasing Showbiz". If "Dream Chasing Showbiz" was boycotted by the whole people, then "King of Comedy" is popular with the whole people.

(End of this chapter)