I became the son of Renzong

Chapter 429
Later generations have a reference to Wang Anshi, which is called Yi Xianggong.

But in the course of this court debate, Zhao Xi discovered that Sima Guang's obsession was not less than Wang Anshi's.

Wang Anshi's theory is based on changes, which has great advantages.

Not to mention the vicissitudes of life, but to talk about the annotations of the classics and history subsets by the great Confucians of the past dynasties, there are also a lot of examples ready-made.

Confucian scholars emphasize inheritance, and the Wenhua of the Song Dynasty also inherited the works of sages of the past dynasties, which gave Wang Anshi an inexhaustible source of arguments for his debates.

People are not good at arguing, at least it is not easy to reprimand the sages.

But Sima Guang is different, his arguments are too simple.If you want to open up the word of sincerity, if you have something in your belly, it is Sima Guang's limit to be able to say it for three days.

Shao Yong seems to have just had an idea of ​​an ideological system, or the focus of his real research is not here.

When he mentioned the relationship between hexagrams and lines and the unity of man and nature, he was refuted by everyone in the Daqing Palace.

Zhao Xi wondered if it was because this view was not recognized by the government that Shao Yong let the people pass it on.

Not to mention, when it comes to inheritance, apart from Neo-Confucianism, Shao Yong's Xiang Mathematics has been passed down for a long time, and the audience is no less than Neo-Confucianism... This is Zhao Xi's muttering.

"Officials, the court debate will last for three days."

Han Qi was probably annoyed too.On the first day, when they each stated their views, they felt a little novel about Han Qi, and they wanted to listen to him.

On the second day, when each school had more arguments than theoretical explanations, Han Qi was no longer interested in listening.

On the third day, even Sima Junshi became a little messy.Even if the officials still wanted to listen, he, Han Qi, would have to stop.

It can't be that the result of the court debate is that the two boys from the Cheng family in Luoyang won, right?

It's like saying that the government affairs hall of the country is not as good as the small officials and the countryside.As the prime minister, Han Qi would never allow this kind of thing to happen.

"Then three days."

During lunch, Han Qi summoned the ministers of the Political Affairs Hall to Yanfu Palace, and Zhao Xi knew it was time to end.

That's good, at least Zhengshitang is not a bunch of nerds.

Don't think this is a court debate, even if everyone is eloquent, Zhao Xi doesn't think that they are all pillars.

Some things need to be done because they have a purpose of their own.

……

"The three-day court debate demonstrated the prosperity of our great Song Dynasty, and we can indeed express our feelings by benefiting a lot."

This is a court debate, and the concluding statement is reserved for Zhao Xi.

"In the past three days, I have listened to everyone's arguments, and I have some insights to share with you..."

ah?They were all stunned.The ministers of the political affairs hall were even more stunned.

What are the officials doing?It's all about everyone, the most correct thing for the officials to summarize the court defense is to say a few superficial words, only for the court defense, not about winning or losing or school views.

Because, the imperial court is the most inappropriate to have an attitude at this time.

The entire country knew that the court debate was caused by scientific research, and the official speech at this time represented the direction of scientific research.

Is it possible to interrupt the official speech?No, no one can.

Han Qi was anxious, and Han Jiang and Lu Gongbi were even more anxious.The two of them had a much deeper understanding of officials than Han Qi.

Regardless of whether it was written by Lu Gong or Han Zhen, in the correspondence between the brothers, they often talked about the official family, but they never said that the official family had such performance.

Wang Anshi and Sima Guang were worried that the officials would deny their views...~
"Let's talk about what it is first. In my opinion, Tao is a rule, a rule. It can be the source, or it can be a modification."

"Take cooking cakes and cakes as an example... It may not be as profound as you guys, but it should explain the problem."

"Cooking cakes and cakes are originally made of wheat or flour, with different condiments added, made in different ways, and finally become different foods."

"Flour is the way of origin, just like what Zhang Zihou said about emptiness and qi. If the particles of flour are regarded as qi, then qi is the origin of cooking cakes and cakes. But can the particles of flour be explored in a more subtle way? Perhaps After all, when it reaches infinitesimal, it is the gas defined by Zihou, and it becomes the grain of flour because of gasification.”

Let's talk, Zhao Xi also knows that he is talking, can he stand still, can he come back in the end?Take a look.

"Next, let's talk about how flour becomes cakes and cooking cakes. It must have been made, and this production must be done in a certain way."

"Steaming is used for cooking cakes, and baking is used for cakes. At the same time, the condiments are different. This is the rule, this is the rule, and this is what Shao Yaofu said."

"Flour cannot be eaten directly, so we have to steam or bake it to turn it into pancakes and cakes. This is what Mr. Jiefu said, Tao is change, and it is practical."

It's really not easy, just an example of cooking cakes and cakes, forced Zhao Xi to incorporate the characteristics of the three schools of thought into it.

You have to continue to call for nothing, and you can't favor one person over another.

"Some people eat sand from cooking cakes, it's because the flour was not cleaned up, or it was not cleaned up when the wheat was milled."

"I ate the cake again and it smelled bad, and I even saw sticky things like brushing in the cake. These indicate that the cake and cake are not good, or they are not suitable for consumption."

"This is the sincerity that Sima Junshi said, the sincerity of people, the sincerity of things, the sincerity of change, the sincerity of origin, and even the sincerity of merchants."

The more Zhao Xi talks about it, the more she admires herself. What is it all about?He just pulled it together.

In fact, all things are the same, which is the truth in later generations.

With the extensive knowledge of later generations and the subtle logic, as long as you want to talk, you can always talk together.

"Let's go back to cooking cakes and cakes. They have the same origin, or to borrow what everyone calls Tao, their origin is the same, and after different Tao shapes and Tao transformations, they have different audiences and tastes."

"Because of this, cooking cakes and cakes are given different names and positions. This is what Uncle Zhou Mao said about noumenon and xinxing."

"Similarly, the materials used for cooking cakes and cakes are different, so their prices are different, and they are treated differently by the common people. This is what Bo Chun and Uncle Zheng said."

"Although the raw materials are the same, it can be said that the origin is the same, but the addition of seasonings and production methods are different, or it can be said that the rules and changes are different, which causes them to be recognized differently. This is the way of heaven."

"Actually, from the perspective of the entire court debate, I don't think that family's words are orthodox, but everyone is just generalizing."

"The origin of Zhang Zihou is based on the sincerity of Zhou Maoshu and Sima Junshi. Under Shao Yaofu's rules, after Wang Jiefu's changes, he finally reached the realm of heavenly principles mentioned by Bo Chun and Zheng Shu."

"Origin, change, and result are all Dao, or the combination of all is the real Dao!"

What Zhao Xi said may be a bit far-fetched. Compared with their debates, Zhao Xi thinks that the Tao he expounded is the most logical.

As for whether others are convinced... this is really not sure.

When does a debate change someone's point of view?
For Han Qi, Han Jiang, Lu Gongbi, and Ouyang Xiu, as long as the officials don't clearly support which school, that's enough.

The official's remarks can be regarded as very reasonable, and it can even be regarded as an ambiguous conclusion on the disputes between various schools of thought.

However, this is the way officials should have.

(End of this chapter)