Helping with Adventurer Party Management

The afternoon discussion begins at last.

Rookie officials will be placed in four squads, and wooden boards will also be distributed to write down ideas.

"We shall now begin our discussion this afternoon. How can we improve the content of the business shared in the morning? You will compete for that idea. I have heard that your discussions in the morning have been very beneficial. So here we have decided to offer an extra prize. Specifically, in the discussions that took place in each squad, the new officials of each squad will submit to me, if anything great, and will announce it from among them, as appropriate. Prizes will be offered for what has been announced. Sometimes, you ask the person who thought of the idea to explain it."

Explain what to add in the afternoon debate.

The trick in doing so is not just to change, but to convey a stronger impression as a bonus that the prize will be added, and also to guarantee the honor of considering the idea, that the criteria for its selection will be assumed by myself, the deputy.

In business planning, brainstorming, etc., it is also important to come up with ideas, but on what criteria do you evaluate and refine them, and in the process after you come up with them?

The people who are actually going are exhausted just talking and getting some satisfaction, so they need an evaluation and execution mechanism to avoid falling into self-satisfaction.

If it were meant to be, it would be nice to be able to discuss it, including even the idea evaluation mechanism, but for today, we shall take on all the mechanisms of the second half here.

(Well, is there anything I can't do)

I have a little anxiety that I don't know the technical part of the details, but when I say it, everyone doesn't.

You know at least a little about it. There's nothing but taking responsibility for yourself.

"Dear deputy, may I ask you a question?"

"Go ahead."

The expert's hand is up, so point to him and give him permission.

It's a bit of an exchange, but I feel something like the modus operandi of the debate pervading the experts throughout the morning discussion.

People of civilian origin are not educated centrally and politely, but all of them perform quite well in the field, so they adapt quickly.

A good technician may be a lot of people who are greedy and honest about absorbing knowledge.

"Adding prize money is a thankful story, but I wonder if it will be imitated by other squads"

After all, did that question come? It was a question as expected, so I will return it as I had previously considered.

"First, I'll give you an assessment when I come up with a good idea. If a newly considered idea based on that idea is a good idea, I would rate it there as well. A good idea is something that is influenced not least by other ideas. If it's a whole new idea, I'd appreciate it. Rate it any way it is to come up with a good idea. Will this tell you?

You can imitate it. Whatever you do. Anyway, the participants had their eyes black and white on the message that they could come up with many good ideas.