Reborn in 2010, the AI ​​in my mind is too powerful.

Intel's timing was very disadvantageous for Google, but there was nothing they could do about it.

In fact, when it comes to the history of developing EDA software, they are earlier than the three major EDA companies, and they have a closed ecosystem, only optimizing for their own use, which has achieved very good results for a long time.

However, with the rise of the three major manufacturers, Intel's self-developed EDA model has become increasingly difficult. With the emergence of FlowEDA, they have had to make the difficult decision to abandon the tradition they have adhered to for thirty years.

After all, the performance differences in EDA are too great, which has directly put them at a disadvantage in their competition with AMD.

This decision was quite upsetting for Intel's top management, as it meant they were no longer special.

But even though it's tough, it's still better than being a high-ranking executive at Google.

The moment Intel released its statement, Google's strategy of feigning inaction officially failed.

Google simply couldn't solve the chip problem, so Larry Page could only direct Google to launch a propaganda campaign to downplay its issues.

Google's public relations machine was activated that day, first by publishing a long article on its official blog titled "Statement on the Open Ecosystem for Chips".

The entire article makes no mention of Chen Yiran, Doubao, or his own Google suite.

The statement simply asserts that chips are a public infrastructure for the entire technology industry, and that no single technology supplier should use its market position to impose exclusive restrictions on downstream customers. It concludes with a very rallying cry: "We call on the entire industry to jointly uphold the open choice of technology paths."

Then he started contacting various groups. The first one he approached was the Computer and Communications Industry Association, an organization that speaks favorably of technology companies to Congress and regulatory agencies. Major technology companies are all members.

But the association isn't stupid; they expressed their concern at the height of the controversy, and then pretended to be silent.

The second organization they contacted was the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, founded in 1978 by David Packard. It represents the interests of over 300 of the largest companies in Silicon Valley and typically focuses on the various relationships between Silicon Valley and the California government.

Google's CEOs have all been senior board members with considerable influence.

Unfortunately, Larry had just taken office, and his actions were too domineering, so they decisively stated that they would not comment on the matter.

Finally, Google pinned its hopes on the various scholars it had been sponsoring.

But they were disappointed again. The scholars all had top-notch IQs and high EQs, otherwise they wouldn't have been able to make money.

Their rhetoric was remarkably consistent: "Academic research does not take into account commercial controversies."

Some professors even secretly told the media that DeepFlow is now a must-have in the lab, and there is no way to bypass it.

After that, all the major companies in Silicon Valley watched the spectacle with amusement.

Only Motorola, which was recently acquired by Google, tweeted: "An open ecosystem is the cornerstone of innovation."

Chen Yiran replied directly below: "Did you think this way before you were acquired? It was only announced on August 15th, and the deal hasn't been closed yet. Do you know that you're still an independent company? Not Google's pawn?"

The tweet sparked a frenzy among thousands of netizens, who then proceeded to berate Motorola until the company deleted the tweet an hour later.

Then the enthusiastic netizens didn't stop, even going so far as to force Motorola to delete its Twitter account.

Google had no idea of ​​the popularity of online office work in the internet age, and within days, Google's reputation had become worse than Microsoft's.

Chen Yiran surfs the internet intensively, posting more than a dozen tweets every day, each one a different way of criticizing Google.

"Google's Street View car filmed the streets for five years, while also secretly recording emails, passwords, and browsing history of all unencrypted Wi-Fi networks along the way."

This is something Google had to admit after the FCC investigation. They say it wasn't intentional? Does anyone believe that? Now, when you search for this incident, the news about it is deliberately pushed to the second page. Typical Google!

"There are sensible people within Google too. The engineering team knew all along that this feature was collecting personal data, and internal engineers sent emails protesting, which were ignored by upper management. The Federal Communications Commission cited this email in its April 2011 investigation report—'What we are doing is illegal in many countries!'"

"Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt said on CNBC in 2009, 'If you don't want people to know, don't do it.' This blatantly revealed that Google enjoys stealing everyone's data. Now he wants Samsung to hand over all of its API call records for its products. It seems that even with a new CEO, the habit of stealing data hasn't changed."

Google is extremely troubled by this and dares not respond to any of them, because these are real scandals that Google wants the public to forget.

They could only keep pushing related topics down the search and YouTube channels. They even started hoping that President Obama could also have a Lewinsky scandal to draw some attention away from them.

But as the situation escalated, Google's enemies also took the opportunity to speak out against Google's domineering behavior.

Oracle: "Google claims in court that anyone can use the Java API. Then, secretly, it implements exclusive agreements in the phone's operating system? Isn't that just a two-faced liar?"

Yelp: "In 2010, our organic search traffic dropped by more than 50% within six months. During the same period, Google embedded its own local reviews at the top of search results. If the chip should be open, when will our search ranking be open too?"

Twitter's Head of Developer Relations: "Last year, Google unilaterally terminated its real-time search agreement, and our tweets disappeared from Google search results. There was no explanation, no negotiation, and today you're calling for an open dialogue."

Groupon: "In December 2010, Google offered $12 billion to acquire us. After the board rejected it, you assembled an identical group-buying team within three months and directly intercepted our traffic from search. This is what you call fair competition."

Twitter was very targeted, pushing all the relevant topics to the top.

Riding on this wave of popularity, Chen Yiran's Twitter followers successfully surpassed 10 million, and she even surpassed Obama to become the third most followed person on Twitter.

Even Twitter's strategy team is still pushing Chen Yiran hard, as if they want him to surpass Lady Gaga and become the number one person on Twitter.

Seeing that the initial attack had generated enough firepower, Chen Yiran added fuel to the fire: "I'm starting to consider making my own search software. Anyway, I have money. I don't need to operate like Google, relying on garbage tools, nor will I use my search to engage in various monopolies!"

Google is becoming increasingly passive. Larry is still sticking to his agreement with Samsung and has even sent the agreement to all mobile phone manufacturers that need to renew their contracts, demanding that they complete a new round of renewals as soon as possible. He is very clear that he wants to push this unreasonable agreement forward.

This greatly spurred the European Union, which was investigating Google's monopoly issues, and they held a press conference that same day.

A spokeswoman for the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition told reporters in Brussels: "We are already monitoring the competitive conditions within the Android ecosystem and will thoroughly evaluate any contracts that restrict consumers' choice of third-party voice services. As long as Google doesn't change its agreements with the rest of the Google suite, the day a contract is signed will be the day the case is officially filed."

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission also had to issue a statement: "The Commission has taken note of recent public discussions regarding competition in the search and mobile ecosystems and is seeking comments from relevant parties. If the allegations are true, an investigation will be initiated immediately."

The same office, the same group of people, but the atmosphere was even more oppressive than before.

The news coming from all sides was very bad. Larry Page covered his head and asked, "What did Intel say? Is it beyond repair? We can finalize a five-year procurement contract with them ahead of schedule."

Urs Holtzler stated with absolute certainty, "It's a done deal. After all, we're only fourth or fifth in terms of Intel's customer base. Dell and HP account for at least half, and they're not going to risk losing the entire market just to do business with us."

Larry Page paused for a moment and then said, "Who's going to the TechCrunch Disrupt startup conference next week? We need to have some leeway in the public eye."

No one else spoke. TechCrunch Disrupt is Silicon Valley's largest annual startup conference, founded by Michael Arlington. He usually starts by conducting one-on-one interviews with tech leaders on stage.

Then the startups go on stage to pitch, and the media and venture capitalists score them from below. The winner gets $50,000 and headlines the next day.

But Michael Arlington is known as one of the most intimidating interviewers in Silicon Valley, and given the current situation, it's uncertain who could keep him in check.

Larry Page looked around and found that no one was paying attention to him. He encouraged himself and said, "I'll go myself. Even if Michael Arlington is difficult to deal with, he's still better than Chen Yiran."

Larry Page had high hopes, but he didn't expect the organizers to cause such trouble.

They broke with convention and invited Chen Yiran to conduct a three-person interview.