American Gossip King

Chapter 221 Public Opinion Reversal

"Extra number! Extra number!"

"Ian Carr has presented compelling evidence that the recording was edited."

"Natalie Portman was involved in framing Ian Carr."

Will Ian Carr file a lawsuit against Natalie Portman over this matter?

As Ian said, the proceedings were quickly made public.

Suddenly, everyone knew that Ian Carr was the one who had been framed, and that Natalie Portman had lied!

This led to a reversal in the situation, resulting in a surge in popularity and soaring sales of Black Deer Absinthe.

Another name associated with Black Deer wine is Ian Carr's two hours.

So reporters flocked to interview Ian, but the content changed.

"Ian Carl, did you spend two hours and twelve minutes with Ms. Natalie Portman?"

"What drug gave you such great power?"

"Is it because of Miss Portman's charm?"

"Will you sue Ms. Portman for defamation?"

Standing in front of Trump Tower, looking at the reporters, Ian straightened his collar and smiled:

"This incident is clearly orchestrated by someone behind the scenes. Whether or not to prosecute Ms. Portman depends on her choice. If she is willing to admit her mistake, I think I can still forgive her. After all, we all know that she is just a young girl, and she couldn't have done this to me for no reason. In a sense, she may also be a victim."

He then looked at everyone and said, "Furthermore, I want to make a solemn statement."

His expression was serious, and his tone was earnest: "Two hours and twelve minutes is not my limit!"

………………

Ian Carr's speech has undoubtedly brought this matter to the forefront once again.

Countless people were excited and discussed it frequently.

Some people were furious that Natalie Portman had defamed them and called for a lawsuit against Portman, demanding that she be kicked out of the entertainment industry.

Some sympathize with Natalie Portman, believing that, as Ian said, she may have had no choice but to do so. Ian's magnanimity is a man's proper demeanor, which has further enhanced Ian's reputation.

Some people are also concerned about Ian's duration; isn't two hours and twelve minutes the limit? Ian Carl is a real man; I really want to be with him!

As a result, various opinions began to circulate.

There are countless suitors online who want to have sex with Ian.

Major media outlets have also published their opinions on this matter.

CBS News stated:

"Ian Carr is undoubtedly a young man with a strong sense of justice. He is not only an excellent journalist, but also has a tolerant and generous heart."

They would certainly say nice things about their own people, but Ian was not satisfied because they didn't mention the Jews. After all, James Paley himself was Jewish, and there were many Jewish executives in CBS. In essence, CBS was a Jewish-controlled company, only controlled by Ian.

ABC News stated:

"We apologize to Ian Carl for our previous erroneous remarks."

This means they've chickened out, they're scared, and they're quickly bowing their heads.

FOX News stated:

"Natalie Portman, while defaming Ian Karl, also brought up the issue of Jewish suffering in an attempt to use it to bind Ian Karl and create antagonism between Ian Karl and Jews, which is a very bad behavior."

On the surface, there was no attack on Jews, but it was actually an implication that this incident might be due to Ian Karl's poor relationship with Jews, and that Jews were secretly instigating it.

FOX is part of News Corporation. Murdoch is not Jewish, so he doesn't mind making a big deal out of it, but he also won't offend anyone too much. So he just touched on the matter briefly.

The situation is different in the newspaper industry.

The New York Daily News published a commentary:

"Ian Carr displayed extraordinary talent in this incident. Perhaps he should go to the San Fernando Valley and conquer everything with his abundant resources. His talent as a porn star may be greater than his talent as a journalist. The great American porn industry should not be dominated by Japan and South Korea. The San Fernando Valley needs a Jordan-like genius to support it."

The New York Times is indeed adept at seizing hot topics and shifting the focus: this is also a Jewish-controlled company.

Sing Tao Daily published a commentary:

"Why did Ian Carr condone all of this knowing that reporters were following them? It seems he knew all along that this would happen, which is tantamount to condoning their crimes."

That's the truth, but I really don't like it.

The public is stupid; they don't need you to enlighten them!

The New York Herald published a commentary:

"This incident should not be linked to the suffering of the Jewish people. As we all know, the Jewish people are a nation that suffered greatly during World War II. They are excellent and resilient, and the actions of a few individuals should not be attributed to the entire nation."

This is a Jewish-run newspaper, so it's understandable.

USA Today published a commentary:

"Natalie Portman must give the public an explanation for this matter, or her future career may be over. And only Ian Carr can decide her fate; if she does not receive Ian Carr's forgiveness, she will lose everything."

This is also a business under the Gannett Group, directly speaking up for Ian and hinting at what Natalie Portman should do next.

The Xingkelun Daily published a commentary:

"While Ian Karl is innocent, his practice of documenting his affairs was a huge mistake and an invasion of privacy. Would girls want to be with someone like Ian Karl?"

Fake!

The Xingkelun Daily was sold, and its recent business performance has been poor. The owner is starting to regret it and is attacking himself?

This is not how you do business!

As for the Los Angeles Times and the Herald, they need no introduction; they were practically raving about Ian.

Internationally, this matter has also sparked much discussion.

Among them, the Chosun Ilbo was the most active, as it is South Korea's largest newspaper.

They shouted:

"Individual behavior is not sufficient to represent a nation or country..."

To put it bluntly, if you don't want to criticize the Jews, then don't criticize our actions in the World Cup either—everyone's actions are individual and do not represent national characteristics.

The latest novel is first published here!

As for China, their performance was much more interesting.

Some people said:

"I absolutely refuse to believe Natalie is that kind of person; Ian Carl must have framed her!"

This is a die-hard fan of Natalie Portman.

Some people shouted:

"I'm no longer a fan of Natalie Portman. I'm no longer a fan of hers."

This is Natalie Portman's regular pink.

Some people shouted:

"Natalie Portman is so lucky. If she could be with Ian Carr, I wouldn't ask for a dowry."

This is a fan of Ian Carl.

Some people shouted:

"Ian Carl is so lucky to have slept with Natalie Portman. I'd be willing to serve twenty years in prison for that."

This is pink on both sides.

Others shouted:

"Censoring is an unethical act."

This is a group of people who only serve the second child.

Others shouted:

"Westerners are just physically fit; when will we ever get rid of our 'sick man' mentality!"

This is a suicidal Western sycophant!

Others shouted:

"Ian Carl is a born troublemaker. He gets into trouble wherever he goes. He's either caught in a gunfight, raped, or robbed, and now he's even being slandered. Is he going to experience every crime pattern in the world?"

This is someone who claims to be clear-headed.

Ian said the suggestion was good, and good news should be diverse.

As for the Southern faction, they certainly wouldn't be that low-level.

They were very tactful:

"As one of the world's most renowned journalists and the head of Carr Media, Ian Carr's every word and action is under the scrutiny of countless people. We should not focus on his lower body or one or two defamation cases. What every person with a conscience should do is pay attention to Ian Carr's work, his dedication, and the countless suffering people in this world."

It's good, as always, it reflects human nature.

The vast majority of public opinion supported Ian, which brought his reputation back from its lowest point to its peak.

Having been falsely accused twice, it's likely that if a similar incident occurs again, people won't dare to criticize him, but will first consider whether someone has falsely accused Ian Carl again.

This will be good for Ian in the future.

Of course, this matter also has negative effects.

Kate, Scarlett, Jessica, Amanda, Britney, and others called to ask if Ian had also recorded them.

Ian had no choice but to explain one by one: "I was just trying to fool the court. I actually knew Natalie Portman had ulterior motives, so I was prepared. You are all my darlings, how could I possibly do anything to hurt you?"

Of course, if you're willing to film, I don't mind. We can enjoy it together sometime in the future. If you're feeling conflicted or don't want to participate in group activities, you might change your mind after watching it.

Don't worry, I will definitely not send the computer out for repair.

(End of this chapter)