Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

What the **** is not approved?

It wasn't just Luo Wenxuan and Lu Zhou's students who were surprised, but Lu Zhou himself, who couldn't believe the content of this email.

After carefully reading Professor Faltings' reviewing opinions, Lu Zhou roughly understood what he meant.

According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some parts of the paper, which leads to serious proof defects in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that Re (s) ≥1-ε There is no non-zero trivial point of the z function in the region of.

To be honest, Lu Zhou wrote this dissertation, but this was the first time he was called back to rectify it.

Standing at the back of Lu Zhou, he also saw the review comments from the beginning to the end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.

"Prove that there is a problem?"

Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to make a conclusion, wait until I see it."

After hearing this, He Changwen, who was sitting with his ears listening, almost flew out of the pen in his hand.

Yes.

Others received a reply suggesting rectification, and the first reaction was that the change was done honestly. When the reviewer is comfortable, and when can the manuscript be reviewed, the big man needs to take a look and say ...

Thinking of this, He Changwen's heart couldn't help feeling a whole lot of emotion.

The big brother is indeed a big brother ...

Whenever he has such awesomeness ...

I didn't notice what a few of my students were thinking.

After finishing that sentence, Lu Zhou bent down and pulled out a printed manuscript of the paper that previously proved the quasi-Riemann's conjecture from the cabinet under the desk, comparing with the position pointed out by Professor Faltings. Check it line by line.

Because he couldn't understand such a profound thing as analytic number theory, Luo Wenxuan stood so eagerly behind the land boat, pretending to understand, waiting quietly for the result of the landing boat.

That's about ten minutes.

Just when Luo Wenxuan and others were about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly closed the dissertation in his hand and threw the stack of dissertation papers on the table.

Seeing Lu Zhou finish reading, Luo Wenxuan asked curiously.

"How is the result?"

Lu Zhou shook his head.

"I don't think I wrote something wrong."

Luo Wenxuan hesitated a moment, and asked, "So ... is Professor Faltins wrong?"

When he said this, there was no anger in his heart.

That was Professor Faltins, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.

On the influence of mathematics, I am afraid it is a little bigger than his mentor Edward Witten.

It's just that the old gentleman is notorious for his strange temperament, and his popularity in academia is not as good as Witten.

"It's too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong," Lu Zhou continued, after standing up from his chair, "I will talk to Professor Faltins about this."

"I'm afraid it's a bit difficult to communicate with Professor Faltins ... the things he has identified will not change, and ..." Hesitated, Luo Wenxuan reminded, "... if you can't convince him, I'm afraid He will be constantly ridiculed. "

"These are secondary," Lu Zhou said, not paying much attention. "If he is right, I will correct it. If I am right, I will not change a symbol."

Luo Wenxuan asked: "If none of you can convince anyone?"

This situation is also quite common in the mathematical world. When the academic level of two people is almost the same, the right of speech in the academic world is extremely close. It is really difficult for anyone to convince others on some specious issues.

After all, the deeper we go into the frontier of research, the less obvious many things are. Sometimes it is possible for two different schools to have two different views on the same issue, and have argued for a long time.

Of course, the charm of mathematics is also here.

No matter how much controversy exists, there is never a dispute that can continue forever, and the right party will always stand out from the crowd. Even the three mathematical crises that have broken out in history have almost shaken the foundation of the entire mathematical building, but in the end people have found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.

"If no one can convince anyone ..."

After a pause, Lu Zhou continued casually.

"It depends on who of us can convince others."

...

There will never be an impermeable wall in this world.

Especially when a group of gossiping creatures lay on the edge of this wall.

On the night Lu Zhou received the review of the Annual of Mathematics, a major event happened on Mathoverflow.

Someone suddenly broke out. The paper on the proof of "quasi-Riemann conjecture" that Lu Zhou delivered in the "Mathematics Yearbook" was called back by the reviewer Professor Faltins.

As soon as this news came out, the topic of the entire forum was immediately detonated. Almost as long as the forum was opened, we could see that someone was discussing this matter enthusiastically.

[Professor Lu was rejected? !! The sun hits the west! 】

[I just said that his certificate was seriously flawed and you all sprayed me. Now look, it's not just me who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks the same way. Dumb! 】

[Just rejection is common, right? Even top scholars will inevitably have some small flaws in their papers. 】

[This is not as simple as rejecting a manuscript. Didn't you see that screenshot? The wording of rejection is not as simple as some small flaws, but "there are major flaws in the core argument". Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the occurrence of this sentence means that if you can't make a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time, instead of calling back to make corrections, you will throw it directly into the trash! 】

[This is too unusual anyway ...]

[Nothing unusual, after all, the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is notorious, otherwise he would not be able to linger in Princeton, and ran back to Germany to teach ... This is too offensive, please allow me to be anonymous. 】

[……]

In fact, in a strict sense, the review process of reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the reply to that review opinion were leaked by some boring person ~ www. The editor of readwn.com ~ Annual Mathematics discovered the incident and immediately contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow forum, and the administrator of the M forum also deleted the explosive posts in coordination. But this is the Internet. Once a secret is known by more than two people, it cannot be called a secret.

What's more, the mathematical world is so lacking in gossip that even small things that are bigger and bigger can arouse heated debate in the entire academic community.

Not to mention, it is two big-class bulls of Faltings and Luzhou. The focus of the debate revolves around the nuclear bomb-level problem of Riemann's conjecture ...

The controversy continued for three full days and neither party responded.

One is a forum that young scholars do not go to. As for another person who has an account, it is probably the kind of person who disdains explanation.

Just as the discussion continued to ferment, just as people talked about what further action would be taken on the landing boat or Faltings, Jinling University, which had been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a blockbuster news on its official website.

The content of the message is very short, but it is only a few hundred words.

However, the amount of information in it is so huge that almost no one can respond.

[On December 18th, our school will launch an academic report on the theme of "quasi-Riemann conjecture proof" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life on the spot regarding the questions in the certification process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating please submit the registration information before December 7th. 】

[Presenter: Lu Zhou (Academician)]

Almost the day the news was released ...

The entire mathematics community suddenly boiled!

Remember the first domain name in this book:. 4 novel network mobile version reading URL: