Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

If you can really solve the problem of controllable nuclear fusion, a research institute is really nothing, even more exaggerated treatment can be considered.

After all, Huaguo is a country that is good at adapting, and the introduction of international cutting-edge talents is always one of the priorities of talent work.

And do not care about the reaction of domestic academic circles.

As the distance is getting closer to October, it is not just the Physics world because of the name Lu Zhou. The Nobel Chemistry Prize jury in Stockholm is also a headache for this name.

The Royal Swedish Academy, located in the quiet corner of the Institute building.

Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Chemistry Prize Committee, was sitting at his desk and looking at thesis in his hand.

“Physical? The scope of your involvement is really wide.” He looked at thesis in the hands of his peers, and Peter Brzezinski’s eyebrows, who had just attended the meeting, lifted his head and was very interested.

“I am not studying physics, but this thesis seems to have caused a lot of sensation in the field of Physics recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I found a acquaintance who knew it and helped me get it.”

For the mathematics formula listed in thesis, Olof must not understand, after all, the profession is not correct.

But this does not prevent him from combining the “Physics Review Letter” at hand, with reference to the professional’s comments, to understand where thesis is outstanding, or what solves the problem that has plagued the Physics community for many years.

Peter stared at thesis for a moment, asking in an uncertain voice: “Lu Zhou?”

“Yes, this is a headache,” paused for a moment, and Olof continued in a joking tone. “I don’t know if we can see him at the nomination of the Nobel Physics Award next year.”

Olof Ramstrom (olof ramstrom), the Institute of Mechanical Chemistry of the Royal Institute of Technology, and the Academician of the Royal Academy, is also a member of the jury of the Nobel Chemistry Prize of 18.

Peter Brezinski, who is standing next to him, is a big cow from the biology of the University of Stockholm. He is also a member of the Royal Academy and a member of the Nobel Chemistry Prize jury.

This month, the name Lu Zhou almost contracted more than half of the Nobel Committee’s controversy, so that they had met several times and did not reach a consensus on the issue.

More interestingly, the focus of those debates is not on the results of the participation in the selection itself. After all, whether it is the “shuttle effect” of lithium-sulfur batteries or the problem of lithium negative dendrites, they are quite level research results.

Moreover, it is not just an application area.

Just last year, he established the “theoretical model of the interface structure of electric chemistry”, which caused a lot of sensation in the fields of computational chemistry, surface chemistry and even condensed matter physics, and won the Hoffman Medal.

However, the Nobel Prize is not a general honor after all. What needs to be considered is not just a certain aspect or a problem in a certain field.

It is true that he has made very good results, but the results are equally good but still in line.

Many people have not even selected the team that has been in the queue for decades. Some people have even been ranked from the prime of the year to the fast-growing land.

There are great differences in the opinions of the Nobel Chemistry Prize jury. Some people think that he and his research are too young, but some people think that youngness cannot be a reason to ignore the importance of the results.

For example, Olof Professor is one of the pros who agrees with the latter.

In his view, it may be worth considering the modification of pdms materials and hcs-1. After all, although these two results have broad prospects for industrialization, they still do not reach a prominent level in terms of the contribution of chemistry. However, the theoretical model of the electrical chemistry interface structure, in his view, has undoubtedly reached a prominent level.

In the past year, many of the scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical models he has established.

It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established, redefining the subject of surface chemistry, has also opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.

“2017’s chemistry award has been awarded to cryo-electron microscopy. 15’s award-winning DNA repair mechanism research is even what Carolynska Medical College should consider. Seriously, if we don’t consider the true chemistry As a result, our Nobel Chemistry Awards Review Board can be renamed the biology button.

Hearing this sentence, Peter Professor, who is engaged in research on the direction of biology, is somewhat coughed lightly.

“Don’t be my friend, biology is also part of chemistry… and cryo-electron microscopy is not a complete result of biology. Can it be considered a methodological study in chemistry?”

Olof shook his head. “This word game doesn’t make any sense. We all know whether it changes biology or biology.”

Someone has done a very interesting statistic. In the five Level 2 subject of chemistry, the most prizes are the polymer and biology chemistry, which even reaches one third. Among them, biology chemistry has won the 26 chemistry award. There are also 6 times for structural biology.

In contrast, the organic synthesis methodology that was awarded to chemistry in real terms has only won 12 awards, and Inorganic Chemistry is even worse…

If you think of dna as a big molecule, then the choice of the Nobel Committee is really not a problem, and it can be logically justified.

However, everyone knows that this is unfair to the chemistry family.

After all, in addition to the chemistry award, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is the place where biology scholars should go.

Now even the cryo-electron microscope has won the prize. It is impossible to say that the chemistry family has no opinion at all.

Looking at his old friend, Peter was lightly sighed.

“I can understand your mood. His work in the field of surface chemistry is really outstanding. The Berlin report was not seen on the spot, but afterwards it was communicated with many Max Planes professors, and their views were not The exception is very high… but what I have to say is that the result is too young.”

Olof asks: “What does it matter? When we award the ‘design and synthesis of molecular machines’, is it different from the contribution that this technology can make in the future?”

“So the awards were indeed controversial and many people expected. But what we have to say is not the focus. The key to the problem is that he is too young,” Peter Professor shook his head, “24-year-old nominee.” … If the Nobel Prize is awarded to him, there is no doubt that he will be the youngest winner.”

Prior to this, the youngest Nobel laureate was 25-year-old Lawrence Prague.

Although Nobel’s widow does not specify how many years the winner must be older, not everyone is happy to break the rules and set a record in history.

Unless he is really good.

However, this subjective problem is quite difficult to judge, unless the Nobel Prize Committee has a school with a surface chemistry direction, which can better describe his work in an objective way…

But unfortunately, among these members, there is no research on the direction of surface chemistry.

In fact, Oloff himself is very hesitant, and he insists on it right.

But he just thought that this Nobel Prize should consider the work in the pure chemistry field.

Or in other words, they should award a theoretical model of the chemistry interface structure.

After all, in the 21 century, it is too difficult to make such an important result in the field of theoretical chemistry…