Scholar’s Advanced Technological System

What is the ghost that is not passed?

It’s not just Louwen Xuan and Lu Zhou’s students, Lu Zhou himself, who can’t believe the content of this email.

After carefully reading the review comments of Faltins Professor, Lu Zhou generally understood what he meant.

According to Faltins Professor, he believes that there is a big controversy in some parts of thesis, which leads to serious proof of defects in the core of thesis. It is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1- There is no non-zero ordinary point of ζfunction in the area of ​​ε.

To be honest, Lu Zhou wrote this thesis, and it was the first time he was called back to ask for rectification.

Standing behind Lu Zhou, I also saw this reviewer from the beginning, and Louwen Xuan swallowed.

“Is there a problem?”

Lu Zhou shook his head. “It’s too early to make a decision. Wait until I see it.”

Hearing this sentence, He Changwen, sitting next to his ear and listening to it, almost did not turn his hand and flew out.

Yes.

Others have received a reply to the proposed rectification. The first reaction is to change the situation honestly. When will the reviewer be comfortable when it will be able to pass the manuscript, the big man will have to look at it again…

Thinking of this, He Changwen’s heart can’t help but feel a whole emotion.

It’s a big fight…

When is he so arrogant?

Did not notice what a few students are thinking about.

After finishing the sentence, Lu Zhou bent down and pulled out the print of thesis that had previously been certified by GFB Riemann’s Conjecture from the counter below the desk, in line with the position pointed out by the Faltins Professor. I checked it in one line.

Because he couldn’t understand the profound things of analytic number theory, Louwen Xuan stood behind Lu Zhou with such a stern look, pretending to be able to understand, and quietly waiting for Lu Zhou’s results.

In this way, it took about ten minutes to go.

Just as Louwen Xuan and others began to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly slammed the thesis in his hand and threw the stack of thesis paper on the table.

Seeing Lu Zhou after reading, Louwen Xuan asked curiously.

“How is the result?”

Lu Zhou shook his head.

“I don’t think I have a problem writing.”

Louwen Xuan hesitated and asked: “That… Is the Faltins Professor wrong?”

When he said this, he had no confidence in his heart.

That was the first person in the mathematics community after Faltins Professor, Alexander Grothendieck.

On the influence of the mathematics world, I am afraid that it will be 1st year more than my mentor Edward Witten.

It’s just that the old mister’s temper is notorious. It’s not as good as the Witten in the academic world.

“It’s too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong,” stood up from the chair and paused for a moment, Lu Zhou continued. “I will communicate this with the Faltins Professor.”

“I’m a little difficult to communicate with the Faltins Professor… The things he’s looking for basically won’t change, and…” Hesitated a moment, Louwen Xuan reminded, “…if you can’t convince him, I am afraid he will be ridiculed by him.”

“These are all secondary,” Lu Zhou said, not paying much attention. “If he is right, I am correcting it. If I am right, I will not change a symbol.”

Louwen Xuan asked: “If anyone can’t convince anyone?”

This situation is also quite common in the mathematics world. When the academic level of two people is almost the same, the right to speak in academic circles is extremely close. It is really difficult to convince anyone on some plausible issues.

After all, the deeper the research into the frontier, the more things are not as obvious as it seems. Sometimes for the same problem, two different schools have two different views, and they have been arguing for quite a long time, and this is also possible.

Of course, the charm of mathematics is also here.

No matter how much controversy exists, there has never been a dispute that can last forever. The right party will always stand out from the crowd. Even the three mathematics crisis that has erupted in history has almost shaken the foundation of the entire mathematics building, but in the end people have found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.

“If anyone can’t convince anyone…”

After a pause, Lu Zhou continued as if nothing had happened.

“Look at who we can convince others.”

……

There is never a wall that is impenetrable on this world.

Especially on the edge of the wall, when a group of biology who are keen on gossip.

On the evening of Lu Zhou’s review of the “mathematics annual” review, a major event took place on Mathoverflow.

Someone suddenly burst out, and Lu Zhou posted thesis on the proof of “quasi-GFB Riemann’s Conjecture” in the “mathematics annual”, which was called back by the reviewer Faltins Professor.

When the news came out, it suddenly ignited the topic of the entire forum. Almost as soon as the forum was opened, it was obvious that someone was discussing the matter enthusiastically.

[Lu-Professor was rejected? ! The sun is coming out to the west! 】

[I said that his proof is seriously flawed, and you all spray me. Now, not only do I think so alone, even the Faltins Professor thinks so, do you spray it? Idiots! 】

[Just a rejection is actually very common? Even the top-level Scholar, it is inevitable that there will be some small flaws in thesis. 】

[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see the screenshot? The wording of the rejection is not as simple as a small flaw, but “there is a major flaw in the core argument.” Do you know what it means? Generally speaking, this sentence means that if you can’t make a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you don’t call back to let you rectify, but throw it directly into the trash! 】

[This is too unusual anyway…]

[Nothing unusual, after all, the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is notoriously uninformed, or he will not be able to mix in Princeton and go back to Germany to teach. This is too sinful, please allow me to be anonymous. 】

[…]

In fact, in a strict sense, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, the screenshots of the review comments are leaked out by which boring person.

After discovering this matter, the editorial department of the annuals of the mathematics immediately contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow Forum, and the administrator of the M Forum also deleted the bulletin. But the Internet is like this. Once a secret is known by more than two people, it can’t be called a secret.

What’s more, the mathematics community is really too lacking in gossip, so that the small things of sesame can cause a heated discussion in the entire academic community.

Not to mention, it is the two big-scale cattle of Faltins and Lu Zhou. The focus of the debate is on the problem of the nuclear bomb level of GFB Riemann’s Conjecture…

The debate lasted for three days and neither of the two parties responded.

One is not a forum where this young Scholar will go. As for the other person who has an account, but probably disdain to explain.

Just as the discussion continued to ferment, when people talked about what Lu Zhou or Faltins would do further, National Quemoy University, which had been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a heavy message on the official website. .

The content of the message is short, but it is just a short word.

However, the amount of information in it is huge enough that almost everyone has not responded.

[12 Month 18 Day, our school will launch an academic report on the theme of “Quasi GFB Riemann’s Conjecture Certificate” in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer the doubts from all walks of life on the evidence of the process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating should submit the registration information before the 12 date 7 date. 】

[Report Speaker: Lu Zhou (Academician)]

Almost on the day when this news was released…

The entire mathematics world is suddenly boiling!