The Heroic Age of the Late Qing Dynasty

Zhang Yinghao was not alone in his attempts to plead for the reinstatement of suspended comrades, pledging their lives and guaranteeing the reinstatement of others. Some even approached Zhang Yinghao's wife, Xue'er, seeking their own "positions." His wife lived in Chengdu, not far away, but not close either. When someone approached him, Xue'er immediately sent someone to inform him. This surprised Zhang Yinghao. In his heart, Zhang Yinghao had no intention of playing a trick on anyone. But the comrades' assurances reminded him of the time when Zhang Feng and Long Tongxu came directly to him, rather than seeking a solution through the organization. However, the chill he felt at that moment was gone, and he found it rather amusing.

Zhang Yinghao turned to Wang Erniu and said: "Comrade Daniu, our work cannot stop while solving problems. We must solve problems in the process of development. If we stop, not only will the problems not be solved, but they will become more and more complicated. Next, we must let comrades learn the organizational principles and organizational discipline of our progressive party and our revolutionary army, and put our political theory into practice.

Let comrades fully understand that we have equality between officers and soldiers, and political equality between superiors and subordinates. If we destroy our ideals, it will harm our comrades.

our own interests.”

Hearing Zhang Yinghao say this, Li Wei asked: "Chairman, what are you talking about with those comrades who are asking for leniency? Don't they really know why those suspended cadres were suspended?"

Hearing this, Zhang Yinghao sneered and said, "Do you think these comrades who are capable of being leaders are stupid?"

After Zhang Yinghao finished speaking, he could see before his eyes the images of those comrades, filled with righteous indignation, pleading for their comrades with a look of righteousness, loyalty, and heroism on their faces:

"Chairman Zhang, you know me. I'm incredibly loyal to you and would never tell a lie. There's absolutely nothing wrong with Comrade xx. He just has a bad temper and can be a bit rough and crude, but he's absolutely flawless at his job."

"Chairman Zhang, Captain XX is from the same hometown as me. I know him best. He would never harm anyone. And if the Chairman asks him to do something, he will definitely do it without hesitation."

"Chairman Zhang, Comrade xx is usually very strict. He also insists on the discipline you set for us! He has offended many people for this. He must have been attacked by others.

It's revenge. You have to investigate it thoroughly! Please give him some leniency.

"Chairman Zhang, Comrade XX nearly drowned in the river while building the bridge. I wouldn't believe anything wrong with him, even if you beat me to death. Besides, he also made considerable contributions. I think you should deduct his contributions and balance his merits and demerits."

Chapter 232: Fight and add more

Zhang Yinghao himself always listened with a smile as these comrades pleaded for comrades who had violated discipline and were suspended. Their actions and exaggerated expressions made Zhang Yinghao feel like he was watching a TV drama. After listening, Zhang Yinghao always sent them away with a smile.

Zhang Yinghao came back to his senses and saw Li Wei and the others shaking their heads, so he continued, "They can be said to be a very outstanding group of comrades in our team."

"What about them?"

"Hey! How can they be so unreasonable? They don't understand reason, right?"

Zhang Yinghao stretched his body back, leaned back in his chair and continued to speak with a relaxed look: "Haha, they are just too sensible and too smart.

In my opinion, the greater the backlash against this incident, the more these comrades know that the suspended comrades have made mistakes. They truly hope that the suspended comrades will receive a lighter sentence, and their plea to us, hoping that we will let those comrades go, is also true.

"Chairman, why is this?"

"None of us sitting here are fools, and no one needs to pretend to be stupid. These people are now pleading for others, which is called being helpful. These people who are pleading are also afraid of making mistakes, and they don't want to be punished for it, so they are leaving themselves a way out. Comrades, think about it, isn't it normal for us to make mistakes? Is suspension from work for study and training considered a punishment for making a mistake? He made a mistake in that position, which means that his ability is not yet up to that level, or he has not yet mastered the scientific principles of handling things. We let them suspend their work for study to help them improve. In my opinion, this is to improve his ability and cannot be considered a punishment.

For those who plead for leniency, it's truly a cost-effective endeavor. If it's granted, that's the best, as it sets an example and prevents future punishment for the same mistake. If it's not granted, it's considered as having done all that's right, and it's also a favor to those suspended comrades, without any real impact on me.

"Chairman, does this mean that these comrades who are asking for mercy are justified? Do they all understand the logic behind this?"

"They may not be clear about what's driving them to plead, but the nature of bureaucracy subconsciously forces them to do so. Perhaps they see their colleagues being suspended and feel a sense of grief for their fellow human beings."

At this point, Zhang Yinghao suddenly understood why Taizu had launched the "Wu" movement. From the winter of 1957 to the spring of 1958, the "Communist Movement" organized the peasants, sparking a nationwide agricultural production boom centered on water conservancy construction and fertilizer accumulation. 3.5 million mu of irrigated area was expanded, 1.4 million mu of irrigated area was improved, 2 million mu of low-lying and waterlogged farmland was reclaimed, 1 million mu of barren farmland was transformed, and 2.9 million mu of forest was planted... Regardless of the accuracy of these figures, this marked the beginning of a "Great Leap Forward" in agriculture.

At this time, Taizu had not yet grasped the true nature of bureaucracy. Seeing the promising agricultural development, he naturally assumed that since agriculture could be developed by the entire nation, industry could also be developed by the entire nation, thus failing to act according to scientific principles. Therefore, it is not wrong to say that Taizu launched the "Great Leap Forward" in industrial development. However, the essence of bureaucracy has always been accountability to superiors, not to those below them. Bureaucrats prioritized achievements and promotions, and the well-being of the people, or even their lives, was of no concern to them. Consequently, in pursuit of so-called achievements, during the Great Leap Forward, bureaucrats from all over the country took action, imposing quotas, giving blind orders, and engaging in false reporting, exaggeration, and communism. In essence, bureaucrats deceived their superiors and subordinates for the sake of their achievements, while the people suffered.

The development of events completely surprised Taizu, and at this point, the movement could not be stopped by Taizu alone. In fact, starting in the second half of 1958, Taizu held six consecutive meetings in an effort to correct the exaggerated style and the impulsiveness of some people. However, he encountered stubborn resistance.

Before the spring plowing of 1959, Taizu, in an unusual move, used internal Party correspondence to write directly to cadres at all levels—provincial, prefectural, county, commune, brigade, and squad. He earnestly advised: "Last year's yield per mu was only 300 catties. This year, if we can increase it by 100 or 200 catties, that would be great. To boast of 800, 1,000, 1,200, or even more is just bragging. It's impossible to achieve, so what good is that?"

So who was so hot-headed, so desperately promoting exaggerated rhetoric? Who was desperately resisting Taizu's orders to correct it? Why couldn't Taizu send a letter directly to the squadron instead of using a central document? The letter stated that many of the lies were forced out from above. The "puffing, pressure, and promises" from above made it difficult for those below to handle the situation.

Even by 1961, the bureaucracy still lacked a unified mindset. Years of the Great Leap Forward and the Anti-Rightist Movement had left some cadres and Party members feeling that the current difficulties were being overemphasized. They waited for the situation to improve before continuing their efforts and making another "leap forward." Some cadres, while believing adjustments were necessary, hesitated, fearing the mistake of negating the "Three Red Banners" (i.e., the general line of building socialism, the Great Leap Forward, and the people's communes). Still others, pessimistic and disappointed in the face of difficulties, grew resentful.

Perhaps it was only at this point that Taizu truly realized the true nature of bureaucracy, believing that the entire country had been controlled by this new group of bureaucrats, who had become a new source of oppression on the people. What could Taizu do? Could he kill all the bureaucrats? No, the country needed them to get things done. And just like Zhu Yuanzhang's killing of corrupt officials, no matter how many corrupt officials he killed, they would never be completely eliminated. In the end, the government would still perish with the leader. At this point, since he couldn't kill them, nor could he do without them, would replacing them be effective? No, bureaucracy is like a dog eating shit. Even if you strictly control it temporarily, it will always want to smell it and will immediately eat it if given the opportunity.

So Taizu began to analyze the problem realistically. What was wrong with acknowledging the objective existence of bureaucracy? Therefore, a greater force was needed to control these bureaucrats. Which force? The power of the people. The only solution was to fully mobilize the masses once again, allowing them to fight against the bureaucrats, so that all the people would change their attitude toward the bureaucracy and form a common understanding: no one (the Party) has privileges; civil servants are servants of the people, serving the people. Once these concepts were deeply rooted in everyone's hearts, the bureaucrats would be trapped.

Of course, Taizu himself was the biggest bureaucrat, so he couldn't say he was completely against the bureaucracy, or against himself. But Taizu betrayed those bureaucrats and chose to stand with the people. Hence the official view of Taizu launching the WG: a large number of representatives of the bourgeoisie, counter-revolutionary revisionists, had infiltrated the Party, the government, the military, and various cultural sectors...to retake power. The implication was that the bureaucrats shouldn't rebel. I wasn't against all bureaucrats, but only some of them. Was there any resistance to the rebellion? Yes, otherwise where would the fighting come from?

Why did the Soviet Union collapse? Numerous answers are available online, many of them well-reasoned. However, the fundamental reason lies in the fact that the fruits of the Soviet Union's development and revolution were stolen by a privileged bureaucratic class. The people, deeply disappointed, simply abandoned the Soviet Union. After the people abandoned the Soviet Union, some bureaucrats attempted to save it against the tide of change. While tragic and heroic, these attempts proved futile.

We say that productivity and production relations are mutually dependent. As the world's second-largest industrial nation, the Soviet Union certainly had no problems with productivity; the problem lay with production relations. What was the Stalinist model? It was essentially a highly centralized bureaucratic system where the government had the final say.

Stalin launched the Great Purge in the Soviet Union, but its purpose was almost completely opposite to that of the Communist Party. At the time, the Soviet Union was struggling to develop a unified ideology, with numerous factions. The Great Purge aimed to unify the thinking within the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Stalin's method of unifying thought was through killing. If he couldn't solve the problem, he would eliminate the person who created it. Stalin's Great Purge was merely a purge within the bureaucracy, but it also made the Soviet bureaucracy incredibly powerful, allowing it to control the country and do whatever it wanted.

Taizu profoundly pointed out that there were huge hidden dangers in the Soviet political system, and that the leaders and cadres of the CPSU had become divorced from the masses and from labor.

The only person who had the opportunity to correct the situation was Khrushchev, but Khrushchev was also a big talker. He only dared to deliver a secret report that fundamentally repudiated Stalin. This report failed to offer a comprehensive historical assessment of Stalin's merits and demerits, failed to identify the root causes of his mistakes, and failed to draw lessons to be learned. Just think of the thunderous cheers during Khrushchev's secret report. The secret report simply pandered to the bureaucrats, gained their support, and Khrushchev gained power. Khrushchev never, and never dared, to mobilize the masses against the Stalinist bureaucracy. Had he dared to do so, he would have truly been a hero. Khrushchev then overturned the Soviet ideological legacy, but he was unable to rebuild it himself. This led to a gap in the ideological sphere, disrupted Party thinking, and left grassroots Party members at a loss as to what to do.

As luck would have it, Khrushchev's secret report was delivered in 1956, and China launched its Great Leap Forward in 1958. It was then that the Great Leader realized the full extent of bureaucracy (the ideology of privilege). He explained that the Soviet Union had a privileged, bureaucratic clique that controlled key government departments and reaped enormous political and economic benefits for itself. Ordinary Party members and the general public had no rights, their opinions were ignored, and retaliation was inflicted.

Taizu also said: "Our country is also in danger. Bureaucratic style has been opposed many times, but it still exists and is even more serious. Bureaucratic thinking is also more serious. Are there any cases of persecution and abuse of power for personal gain?

They know more than I do. But they only report good news and not bad news. This is also the nature of officials and the way they work. Being an official has privileges, political needs, and connections. ..... This can easily lead to the corruption, degeneration, and degeneration of cadres. The Soviet Union is a lesson. I am very

Worry...…"

Many people know the word WG, but they don’t know who WG is trying to revolutionize. Who are our enemies and who are our friends? This is the primary question of revolution. For Taizu, WG is about the privileged thinking.

The revolution was the revolution against the bureaucratic ideology and the feudal ideology of the people. Taizu knew from the Soviet Union that it was not enough to just develop the economy and science. Otherwise, the fruits of development and revolution would inevitably be stolen by the privileged class.

In order to achieve this, we must first get rid of some ideas, so it is called the Cultural Revolution.

For Taizu, it didn't matter who the bureaucrats overthrew. As long as they could achieve their goal of awakening the people, educating the people, and training the people, and preventing the people from being controlled by the bureaucrats, that would be enough. As for Mr. Liu, he was just unlucky. After all, his position at that time represented the general representative of the bureaucratic class. Twenty-eight thousand people were imprisoned for speaking up for him, and as many as twenty-eight thousand people were tried. Of course, those literati, those who sang praises to the kings, princes, and generals were all those who spoke for the bureaucrats, and they were all among those who were overthrown. As for whether they were wronged or not, innocent or not, it didn't matter. Haha, they were all just sacrifices to history. Those delicious chickens, ducks, fish, and meat on the altar, and those pig heads and cow heads were wronged or not.

Is there such a thing as innocent?

Taizu stood with the people and was not afraid of this group of bureaucrats rebelling against him, because the people would fight against this group of bureaucrats.

Unremitting theoretical and practical struggles, on the one hand, enabled the Jin Dynasty in China to completely break the shackles that had been placed on the Chinese people for more than two thousand years since Confucius, and to dare to challenge "authoritarianism." On the other hand, it was necessary to allow officials within the H system to go down to the grassroots level to interact with the people and engage in labor. As for the so-called "destroying the four olds"

Movements, intellectual re-education movement, up to the mountains and down to the countryside movement, etc., actually have the same purpose.

Why didn't Taizu hand over power to the Gang of Four before he passed away? Because without Taizu, unless there was another full-scale civil war, anyone who opposed this group of bureaucrats would really be looking for death. So when Taizu passed away, it actually meant the end of the WG. Moreover, the ideas promoted by Taizu had been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Even if power was handed over to this group of bureaucrats, they would not dare to

Do whatever you want again.

As for evaluating the merits and demerits of wg, haha, the feudal era of China began when the Qin Dynasty swept across the world and unified the country, but because of the second emperor of the Qin Dynasty

The Qin Dynasty was destroyed and reviled for two thousand years. It was not until the end of the feudal era in New China that there began to be objective research on the Qin Dynasty and signs of vindication. Of course, the lack of historical materials makes it almost impossible to fully understand the situation.

wg began in the socialist era. As long as our social form has not undergone a leap forward, it is impossible to objectively evaluate this history.

Only when the socialist era ends can people look back at history objectively and fairly. Perhaps looking at the research on wg in capitalist countries would be more objective and fair.

Chapter 233:

At this point, both he and Taizu were facing resistance from the bureaucracy, privileged comrades unwilling to relinquish their power. However, Taizu hadn't always been at the top; he had risen to the top through consistent correctness. Furthermore, the bureaucracy Taizu faced was already well-established, so he could only rely on thoroughly mobilizing the masses, dismantling the entire system and rebuilding it. But he had been at the top from the beginning, and had built these systems himself. Now, he faced only a small amount of bureaucratic resistance. As long as he consistently promoted the concept of serving the people, promoting the idea that no one had privileges, and as long as the masses understood the organizational principles, ideals, and discipline of the Forward Party and the Revolutionary Army, these bureaucrats would be powerless.

Thinking of this, Zhang Yinghao said directly: "We don't need to care about the reasons of these people who ask for mercy or what they think. These are not important to us at all. We just need to mobilize the masses openly, comprehensively, and from the bottom up, so that the masses and grassroots organizations can understand the organizational principles, concepts and discipline of our Forward Party and Revolutionary Army..."

After Zhang Yinghao finished arranging the work, everyone was busy and left. Wang Daniu couldn't ignore his subordinates, so he went to the confinement room to talk to Geng Biao in person.

Geng Biao was now deeply regretful. Ever since being suspended for self-reflection, he hadn't left the room, awaiting the final outcome. While he might have scolded the instructor and shoved a guard, those weren't serious matters. Was it necessary to make such a fuss? He was feeling a bit overwhelmed. While he understood his status as a wage earner, how could others be worse off? He was a regimental commander overseeing over a thousand people—a prestigious position, a position many coveted. He had never dreamed of such prestige, yet now he was suspended and isolated. While he hadn't been imprisoned, the sudden cessation of all his duties was incredibly difficult. He was also forced to undergo an investigation and criticism, the most painful of which was the "self-criticism."

Geng Biao thought he'd merely pushed a guard and cursed a political instructor. What was the big deal? Were his soldiers treated like ancestors, unbowable and unreliable? But in the eyes of his political department comrades, this seemed like an unforgivable sin. What ideological roots were there to dig into? Even if his own son had done something wrong, he'd still punish him, let alone a subordinate.

When he was first suspended for investigation, Geng Biao argued fiercely at first, and then a fierce conflict broke out.

In subsequent conversations, Geng Biao initially insisted that he was innocent, that he hadn't actually hit anyone, that it was all a joke, and that the comrades were making a big deal out of nothing. Later, seeing no way to explain himself, he reluctantly admitted that he had acted too impulsively. Even so, Geng Biao emphasized that he had merely reprimanded the instructor because he saw he wasn't doing his job properly, and hoped he would correct his mistakes in the future, upholding the attitude of criticism and self-criticism that the comrades were seeking.

Since Geng Biao still couldn't recognize his mistakes, his problem could only be put aside for the time being, and the problems of other comrades could be solved first. As for how long Geng Biao would stay here, it would depend on how long it would take to fully handle this matter.

"Geng Biao, what do you want me to say about you? What exactly do you want to do?" "Commander Wang, I just pushed the guard, I didn't mean to hit him."

"Then why did you scold the instructor in front of him?"

"I didn't mean to scold him. I just said a few words to him because I felt he wasn't doing his job well. I'm the regiment commander and he's the instructor. If he doesn't do a good job, is it okay for me to say a few words?"

"I know you've never been a bad person, it's just..."

Hearing this, Geng Biao immediately shouted: "Commander, I am not a bad person."

Wang Daniu came back and told Zhang Yinghao about the conversation between him and Geng Biao. After listening to it, Zhang Yinghao was a little dazed.

Wang Daniu saw Zhang Yinghao's absent-minded expression. Everyone said it was Zhang Yinghao's characteristic way of thinking, and they all knew he was still listening. Wang Daniu felt that this was a sign of Chairman Zhang's intense focus, so he dismissed it and continued, "Chairman, I've always thought Geng Biao was quite good, but I didn't expect him to refuse to admit his mistake over such a minor matter. In this situation, it's clear that honestly admitting their mistakes is the best option! I simply can't understand!"

Zhang Yinghao, upon hearing Wang Daniu's words, felt that something was definitely amiss. He closed his eyes slightly, reflecting on Wang Daniu's account and the behavior of Geng Biao and the others. Someone who clearly knew they were wrong yet refused to admit it was only because admitting would cause them greater harm. These comrades had little financial gain, so what was it that truly frightened them?

Suddenly, Zhang Yinghao opened his eyes and asked, "You just said Geng Biao said he's not a bad person?"

"Yes, he doesn't admit that he is a bad person."

Zhang Yinghao heaved a long sigh of relief and leaned back in his chair.

He said completely relaxedly: "This is the problem. What kind of landlords and bullies are we looking for? The first point is that they have committed many evil things. If these comrades now admit that they are bad people, then they will be divided into B5 people like us landlords and bullies, which means we can deal with them at will.

They are naturally very scared and would never admit they are bad people even if beaten to death."

Zhang Yinghao had never thought about the good guys before. In his opinion, the bad guys were naturally those who broke the law. But the comrades who were on duty were not breaking the law. At most, they were just a violation of discipline.

Even many comrades who have violated discipline cannot be considered as such. They only need to be criticized and educated, admit their mistakes, and reform themselves.

But those were the standards I brought from my past life; they weren't the same in this day and age. In this era, good and bad are the criteria for judging a person, even the most important criteria. Just like those landlords and evil gentry, they were to be criticized and denounced because they had done bad things and were bad people. In this era, good people can arbitrarily deal with those who are generally considered bad.

Even during the Communist Party era, to kill someone, they first had to criticize and denounce them. They would stigmatize the target of the struggle session, putting high hats on them and painting them in ugly makeup to vilify them. Otherwise, nothing could be done. Even General Zhu almost got labeled a "black commander." If he had been, the young generals would have dared to do anything to him. Even during the crackdowns of the 1980s and 1990s, parading people through the streets was meant to tell the public that these people were bad. In this era, where people's moral judgments are overly valued, once someone is socially disgraced, they're practically finished.

Zhang Yinghao poured Wang Daniu a cup of tea and said, "Comrade Wang Daniu, the people are very satisfied with our propaganda praising the working people, because this propaganda recognizes that the common people are good people, and the people naturally like it. The reason why many comrades are now very resistant to the rectification movement is that Comrade Geng Biao's description of good people and bad people is very good and correct, because these mistakes may directly classify them as "bad people." Good people can kill bad people, this is an axiom in this era. Even for their own sake, no one wants to fall into the ranks of bad people who can be "slaughtered at will by good people." I think his mentality can represent the mentality of the comrades who have been suspended. They are not even afraid of sacrifice, but they don't want to be considered bad people in the eyes of their comrades."

Wang Daniu's train of thought didn't catch up with Zhang Yinghao's thoughts for a moment. After a moment of silence, Wang Daniu finally realized what was happening and asked, "Chairman, do you mean that mistakes are mistakes and bad people are bad people?"

Zhang Yinghao nodded and said, "It should be said that making mistakes is not a crime. Daniel, do you think there is anyone in this world who doesn't make mistakes?"

Without even thinking, Wang Daniu shook his head and said, "Absolutely not."

Zhang Yinghao recalled how, in his previous life, people's expectations of civil servants were becoming increasingly high, almost to the point of nitpicking. They felt that civil servants who made even the smallest mistake should be punished with a single blow, believing there were no shortage of people who wanted to be civil servants, so they could just replace them. This attitude was problematic. Moreover, when people saw this person's comeback not long after, they were incredulous, filled with darkness and insider information, and felt that the world was utterly dark and hopeless. Was this true?

In fact, these civil servants have not committed any crime. They may have handled things in a simple and rough manner, or they did not know how to deal with some problems. They just did not have the knowledge.

It's just that the scientific laws have made a mistake. If you do something wrong, you will be suspended from work to learn and reflect.

What's the problem with going back to work? If a civil servant commits a crime, embezzles

Bribery, power-for-money transactions, etc., he can still make a comeback, that is a real big problem

If humans have developed to the point where they no longer make mistakes, then

There will be no problem if civil servants cannot make even the slightest mistake.

Zhang Yinghao nodded again and said: "We must first understand that every

Everyone makes mistakes. I have repeatedly emphasized in Theory of Practice that making mistakes is not

If a person does not make a mistake, that is the greatest

A person who does something without understanding the objective laws will

Mistakes are bound to happen, which will lead to the failure of this matter.

The practice process is to keep learning, keep summarizing, and keep practicing.

Only by following this cycle and finding the scientific laws behind it can we accomplish this task.

This is what Confucius meant when he said "Don't make the same mistake twice."

I have made it very clear in "On Contradiction" that mistakes are subjective and

So our comrades are not bad people, they just made a mistake.

So we organize them to study and improve their understanding and

Ability. A comrade was promoted from regimental commander to division commander.

If a student makes repeated mistakes, it means that he is not capable enough to be a teacher.

We suspended him, let him learn, and then he can serve as the leader for a period of time.

If there is no problem, we can promote him to be the division commander.

If they don't care about their mistakes, they will not recognize their mistakes.

Keep making mistakes, this is the most irresponsible attitude towards them.

Criticism and self-criticism are actually about asking our comrades to improve each other.

already. "

"Chairman, aren't you being too lenient?"

Zhang Yinghao smiled helplessly and said: "Since we admit that I

We all make mistakes, so there's no such thing as tolerance or intolerance. Mistakes are inevitable when it comes to doing things. If we condemn someone to death with a single blow, who will dare to work? Who will be willing to take on work? Who will be willing to forge ahead? Just like our revolution now—no one has ever done it before, just like our industrial development—no one has ever done it before. If we stop giving people chances after they make mistakes, I think it won't be long before everyone just lies down and dies.

"Haha, Chairman, that's indeed the truth. However, some comrades just don't understand it. They feel wronged, and it wastes a lot of their time."

"You're right. It's really unfair. Think about it. We don't work for ourselves. If we make a mistake, we have to be suspended for study. What's the point? Just like we built this railway. We can all use it, of course, but it's really serving the general public. This railway is not ours after it's built, so why work so hard? Why should we pay for it? Moreover, we make them work so hard, and we don't allow them to be lazy or make mistakes, and the compensation is not much. How can they not feel wronged? After being suspended for study, how can we make up for the time spent on study? After the study, the comrades are generally demoted. Those comrades who were previously at the same level have been promoted, but they are still demoted. How can they not feel wronged? However, there is no way. A person's ideas are not isolated. Any idea is a reflection of his or her entire ideological system. Therefore, we must let the comrades who have made mistakes learn and correct themselves."