Coquettish Rebirth

Jia Hongjian wrote this article in the name of his father. After it was published, it really caused an uproar in the media.There must also be an uproar. Without a great uproar, how can it be said that a single stone stirs up thousands of waves?Where did this uproar come from?It wasn't that a woman named Xuan Ran made a big fuss, but caused all kinds of quarrels in various media across the country!

First of all, one day after this article appeared in the newspaper, there were various rebuttal articles the next day!What is this rebuttal?It is a so-called economic expert Li Dewei, who is this Li Dewei?No one knows where he came from, but it is said that the title is a researcher of the so-called Economic Research Institute.What is Li Dewei talking about? First of all, what he said was the lack of distribution according to work in the so-called "socialist distribution system"!

According to him, in state-owned enterprises, especially state-owned enterprises such as Zhujiang Refrigerator Factory and even Hongta Tobacco Group, if there is no strong leader, these once rotten small enterprises can become what they are today. so?Of course, he did not dare to violate an unspoken rule recognized by socialist countries-the strength of the working people.During the New Democratic Revolution and the Socialist Revolution, it was said that the masses created wealth and capitalists were exploiters.Today, although this concept has removed the idea that capitalists are exploiters a lot, and people don’t see private bosses as if they saw class enemies, workers still think that they are the owners of the factory and that they have contributed the most.Of course he, Li Dewei, couldn't say that the workers are actually like machines.

"Of course the workers have made a lot of contributions, but there are specialties in the technical industry. The workers are proficient in manufacturing products and repairing machines. They don't understand how the market should operate. If there are no suitable and capable leaders of state-owned enterprises, then this state-owned enterprise will also be in trouble. It can only be reduced to one of the 39 loss-making enterprises in the 18 major industries. No matter how big the ship is, it must rely on the rudder to navigate, and the train runs fast, all rely on the front belt. The country's engine is our party, and the enterprise's The head of the car is the factory manager! It is the management of the enterprise! Under such circumstances, it is the management of the enterprise that makes the enterprise bigger. Pay? Some people will say, oops. They've got enough now! It's already a lot!

But isn’t this the same as what many people said before the land contract responsibility system?society is improving.The country is reforming, and we must constantly adapt to the new situation of social development.Now the domestic state-owned enterprises are generally not profitable, so in this case, we should follow the same as the land joint production contract responsibility system in the past.Contracted to the household.Why can the country's land be contracted to individuals.So why can't state-owned enterprises be contracted out to individuals?As long as the contract is contracted, the value of state-owned assets will increase every year, and then more work will pay more. What's the problem? "

"So here I would like to propose the principle of the responsibility system of the owners, operators and laborers of my country's enterprise reform. That is to say, the greater the responsibility, the greater the power, and the final profit should be corresponding It’s big. It’s the same as the joint production contract responsibility system. If the individual manages well, obviously the big part should belong to the individual, while the state can only get more rent every year. It is enough to ensure that the state-owned assets continue to make money for the state. Adding value, that's it!"

After a series of advocacy of contracting companies similar to contracting land, this guy finally started to turn the topic to Jia Gang. "Mr. Jia said before that if the person in charge of a state-owned enterprise feels that he can't get the shares of the state-owned enterprise, he might as well start his own business after being laid off, and he chose BBK as an example to illustrate. From Mr. Jia's point of view, such an approach is obviously very manly. Son, it is a very loyal approach, it does not seem to harm the interests of the country, and it has given itself a brand new stage, as if this approach is very perfect. But in fact such an approach is not very perfect, even It is not perfect! Because without a suitable leader, the development of the original state-owned enterprises can easily fall into a slump! Therefore, the leaders of many state-owned enterprises are not because of the sissy habits described by Mr. Jia. In fact, it is because of their love for the state-owned enterprises that they cannot leave, because they are afraid that if they leave, the company will be over! Even if it is like Backgammon, their management is all from Xiaobawang, but how is Xiaobawang now? Xiaobawang’s products can be said to be completely targeted by Backgammon’s products. Backgammon is good, but Xiaobawang is ruined. Does Mr. Jia mean that it doesn’t matter if the state-owned enterprises are destroyed?”

Whoa!The article written by this guy is really interesting. It can be said that he caught the loopholes in Jia Hongjian's words in one go!If it is said that Jia Hongjian first publicized those state-owned enterprise leaders for the benefit of the country and suffered a little loss for the country, anyway, he has learned a lot and accumulated a lot of contacts.But what this person said directly, if it was based on Jia Hongjian or Jia Gang's intentions, then the result is likely to be that the leadership of the state-owned enterprise jumped out to build a private enterprise, but the original state-owned enterprise was broken.In this way, is Jia Gang and Jia Hongjian's idea good for the country or not?And it doesn't matter if the state-owned enterprise is broken, how many workers are there in the state-owned enterprise, and who is responsible for these workers?

After this article was published, there were similar articles on various media all of a sudden, saying from various angles that state-owned enterprises cannot leave their leaders, because if they leave, the state-owned enterprises may be finished, and then many workers and Their families will follow suit!It's as if they are the only state-owned enterprises in the world who can lead them!Then he said it as if Jia Gang's thoughts were purely out of his head!

After these column articles appeared in various newspapers or on TV, all kinds of domestic public opinion suddenly became a little confused.Originally, after Jia Hongjian published the article in the name of his father, many ordinary people were on the side of the old Jia's father and son.But after the article by Li Dewei and others, everyone suddenly felt that what they said was right, so they didn't know who to support!

But at this moment, when Jia Hongjian read such an article, he really felt that he had met his match!Such a Li Dewei, Jia Hongjian knew that he should be a spokesperson for the class of state-owned enterprise leaders-in fact, using the analysis method of the chairman’s grandfather or something, it may seem very old-fashioned, but it is really useful in many cases!If you haven't learned this analysis method, ordinary people in foreign countries may not be able to figure out why Li Dewei said that, and they will easily fall into a point of academic debate without brains, and then they will easily be brought up by others. Off track!Not to mention this kind of ideology or public opinion debates on related policies, even if they quarrel on forums, there are too many people who are led to the ditch by veterans after a few quarrels!

Jia Hongjian didn't even need to analyze, he knew that Li Dewei must be a spokesman for his interests - how many well-known state-owned enterprises in China are in charge now, they are all trying to privatize!This is similar to how many so-called experts and scholars on the Internet called for the privatization of the Ministry of Railways when the bullet train accident happened in later generations. The people have to stone them to death - the British railways are rotten because of privatization!Even Britain, a capitalist country, has not considered re-nationalizing the railways!

So, after such an analysis, we can know that it is impossible for Jia Hongjian to persuade Li Dewei and others, because Li Dewei and others are not arguing with Jia Hongjian at all, but are fighting for the position of public opinion.What is such a result? It is similar to debating on the Internet-it is basically impossible to convince the other party, expecting the other party to bow their heads and admit their mistakes, and admit that you are right, that is simply a fantasy!If the opponent feels that he is about to lose, it must be all kinds of sloppy rolling, all kinds of self-declared victory, or even take the initiative to pull you to the same level as him, and then defeat you by relying on rich experience-such as edge kicks After making you angry and scolding, he went to the administrator to complain about your personal attack or involving your family members, and then directly blocked your account!Jia Hongjian has seen this kind of thing a lot in his previous life, okay?

So at this time, the experienced Jia Hongjian knew that there was no need to continue arguing with the opponent, or that there was no need to expect to be able to persuade the opponent, which was basically impossible.What Jia Hongjian will continue to do is to compete with the other party for the crowd who don't know the truth!That is to say, to compete for hearts and minds!This kind of public opinion battlefield, if we don't occupy the enemy, we will occupy it!So now it doesn't matter who is right and who is wrong, what matters is who the people think is right and who is wrong!

This sounds a bit mysterious, what does this thing have to do with **'s analysis method?The relationship is obvious - we have analyzed that the most important thing is to occupy the hearts of the people, to convince the people that what we say is right, then we must try our best to make the people feel right, or let the people understand or even understand what we want to say. From the perspective of the common people, what he said made them feel that what Jia Hongjian said was the best for them!Only in this way can the common people support Jia Hongjian!The other party wants to justify the privatization. They want to justify the privatization. At most, they say that it is good for the country and the enterprise account, and they will never say that it is good for the common people—the common people are not stupid. Everyone can eat and drink as much as they like, steal things at will, and get privatized and be scolded by the boss like a grandson. Which good ordinary people don't know?So the difference between these is the big difference between Jia Hongjian and the other party competing for popular support!

As long as Jia Hongjian can grasp the hearts of the people, it can be said that Jia Hongjian's method is good for the common people, then obviously in the eyes of the common people, what Jia Hongjian said is correct, and what Li Dewei said is all kinds of bullshit !So the only question now is, how can we not privatize state-owned enterprises, or in other words, not privatize good state-owned enterprises, is it beneficial to the common people? (To be continued..)