Coquettish Rebirth

In the process of state-owned enterprise reform, how can the state-owned enterprises with good returns not be privatized, and not MBO to benefit the common people?This is a big question.In some respects, Jia Hongjian knew that many state-owned enterprises would be sold in the coming retreat from the state and the people into the country.If the non-privatization of good state-owned enterprises is said to have too much "commonality" with enterprises with poor returns, then ordinary people may question why poor enterprises must be sold—and the ones sold may also be MBO, that is, management buyout.

And if the real people think that poor companies don't need to be sold, it will obviously bring trouble to the implementation of national policies.Jia Hongjian himself knows that the current economic situation is not very good, and he doesn't want to add chaos to the country, does he?So it's really difficult to get this thing done.

So how would Jia Hongjian criticize Li Dewei's theory, and make it understandable to the common people, and speak from the standpoint of the common people?First of all, Jia Hongjian first wrote it like this-he criticized private ownership!You must know that in these years, the concept that private ownership is an advanced system is really taken by everyone!Let alone now, in 2012, there will still be a group of people advocating that private ownership can increase the efficiency of state-owned enterprises!Isn't this nonsense?Is Whirlpool, an international white goods giant, a state-owned enterprise?Of course not, they are private enterprises!But why is this private company more bureaucratic than a state-owned company? Adding a sponge pad can solve the problem of the broken glass of the washing machine, but after half a year of back and forth, it can't be solved!In this way, what the hell is private enterprise more efficient?Get out!Any company that grows bigger has a big business disease!The disease of large enterprises is bureaucracy and poor traffic between departments!It's all kinds of procrastination!Otherwise, where did the saying that the boat is small and easy to turn around come from?

Moreover.After the privatization of the British railway system, has the efficiency increased?Get out!I don't know how much the efficiency is procrastinating!why?Because private enterprises do not contribute to the country and the people!People are doing it to make money!And is there any competition for things like railways?To put it bluntly, is it possible for a railway line like mine to compete?The car running on it can only belong to one company!Otherwise, it is not easy to schedule!A line is handled by one company from investment to vehicle operation. Isn’t this the monopoly on this line?Then you said that such a monopoly will continue to improve the level of equipment?nonsense!The company invested 1000 million to build a railway, so why not just earn as much as you can?If Jia Hongjian built a railway, invested 2 million yuan, and just made 5 million yuan, you let me reinvest?Play with eggs!Do I get paid for anything else?Then earn 1 million and reinvest?Go play egg 10!I haven't earned enough yet! [-] billion?Just play around, and no one is competing with me, so I just won't upgrade.You ordinary people have the ability to take other people's trains!This road belongs to our family!

Even on the Chinese side.The privatization of railways is even more irritating—for example, cars and planes are basically full-priced or even price-increased tickets on holidays. Air tickets can be booked several months in advance, but how much in advance are train tickets and bus tickets? Monthly order?If this is a private company operating the train line, such as Huaxia Hi-Tech.Then I won't raise the price when I'm full of food for the Spring Festival?please.A market economy is determined according to the relationship between supply and demand!What is the relationship between supply and demand?That is, you all have to take the train home.Then I am the boss!Originally, I didn't have enough capacity, and the price has risen all the way to sky-high prices, whether you like to sit or not.If I don't sit, I can also reduce the pressure on my transport capacity!Do you still want to run a thousand kilometers for two or three hundred for a train ticket?Beautiful you guys!The full-price air ticket for 1200 kilometers is [-]. For example, my train ticket for [-] kilometers has doubled from the usual two to three hundred to five or six hundred.I am a market economy!

So what private ownership can make the enterprise more efficient, or make the service performance of the enterprise stronger and the service level higher, that is basically nonsense!That's right, it's bullshit!What can really improve the level is competition, not privatization!With competition, such as in the field of home appliances, isn't tlc a state-owned enterprise?Even if tlc is contracted out, it is essentially a state-owned enterprise!Isn't this Changhong a state-owned enterprise?Aren't they fighting for the market, marketing and service one by one?Is Lianxiang a state-owned enterprise?All kinds of gold medal services in Lianxiang. During the warranty period, the hard drive of the brand machine is broken. The technician on the phone will come to check it. After the test is completed, replace the hard drive immediately. Then, don’t turn around and leave without a cigarette or a glass of water. Lianxiang company also called to ask how the service quality is!How many private companies can do this?In the later generations, private companies ignore people after they buy things, and the one who cheats counts as one less?Is this well-served Lianxiang a state-owned enterprise?His major shareholder is the Chinese Academy of Sciences!

Only when there is competition, can there be an impetus to improve service and efficiency, because enterprises need more money to survive!However, these days, many ordinary people have been induced intentionally or unintentionally, and always think that privatization is to stimulate everyone's subjective initiative, and the company will be better, and the service will be better—fart!If it is privatized, the boss will be able to make more money. Does it have anything to do with the company?Has anything to do with service?To make an inappropriate analogy, those barbecue stalls on the street use duck meat soaked in sheep urine to pretend to be mutton. Isn't this a "private" stall?Has the service level increased?Let alone China, there were so many unscrupulous things in foreign countries in the early stages of capitalist development!Among other things, didn't the later generations of Dawan also have plasticizers, so that the children's penis is as big as a grain of rice!Is this a system reason?Not to mention Nestle and Japan's Meiji milk powder, which have had food safety problems, and even Japan's Meiji milk powder and poisoned milk powder have caused big-headed dolls!Is this because of the system, is this the reason for public ownership and private ownership?

As for Jia Hongjian, he first refuted such a meal of private ownership, and what he did was to block Li Dewei's way of fooling around.Here he put the facts and reasoned and said what Datong is for, in order to let the common people know that privatization is not necessarily good!And public ownership is not necessarily bad!

In the aspect that public ownership is not necessarily bad, Jia Hongjian also began to present the facts and make sense—the first thing to talk about is the PHS that is now used by ordinary people.If it is a public communication company, the state is obliged to improve the lives of ordinary people across the country, so it will order the communication company to lay base stations.Although it is said that in densely populated places, the laying of this base station can make the communication company make money, but what about in sparsely populated places?For example, on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, where no one can be seen for a hundred miles?If there is a driver on the road and the car breaks down, without a base station, it is impossible to find someone to help tow the car!No one may even know that they starved to death there!At this time, for example, if you get a base station along the highway, it must be a money-losing business, and you might not be able to earn back the investment for the rest of your life.If this is a private company, it will definitely not do this!But for public companies, it may be necessary to lose money because of political requirements!

So next.Jia Hongjian introduced the topic to the aspects related to the future national reform - so.In industries related to national security and economic security, such as military industry and banking industry, it is impossible for us to privatize, and what about the other side.That is, industries with natural monopolies cannot be privatized.What is a natural monopoly industry?That is, a series of departments such as railways, water supply, power supply, gas, and so on.To be honest, competition in these departments will not yield good results.Because everyone competes with each other, no one can provide cheaper products-because these industries are industries that pay attention to scale effects, and only when one company dominates the scale can it run and make money!If we talk about a city with a population of tens of millions, there is only one water supply company.Then the water supply company may only need to build a water plant, and then the scale will increase. If each household earns a penny, how much will the tens of millions of people earn?But what if there are two water companies?Two waterworks are going to be built?It is impossible for each company to say that it buys water from the other company?So the cost has risen and there are fewer users. Is the unit price going to rise?Is it an economic law that the unit price has risen?In the end, did the common people get more expensive water instead?

The same is true for the railway industry. It is clear that freight is more profitable than passenger transportation, but now there is only one family. Even if politics requires Spring Festival transportation to be the first priority, the passenger transportation subsidized by the freight railway department is not bad.But if you separate freight and passenger transportation, then the freight department will be happy, and the passenger transportation department will hate it-no money!The passenger transportation department is out of money, and you can still count on him to buy a better front to speed up?Even if it is like the New York subway, the largest subway transportation network in the world, those two or three companies operate in different areas, and in the end, there is no effect in the end—whatever the service, the environment, and the rotten mess, you can see it on the train A mouse about the size of a cat!All kinds of old models make people feel motion sickness when sitting on them!

The last one that cannot be privatized is the various departments that provide large-scale public services, such as the telecommunications department and the like, which must not be entered by private individuals, because they only aim at making money, not at To serve the common people——Of course, it is really a public company, so it does not serve the common people wholeheartedly. It mainly wants to make money, but a small part has to take care of the common people, right?

After saying this, Jia Hongjian began to classify them slowly again.When it comes to state-owned enterprises with good returns, Jia Hongjian did not say that MBO is not worth it. According to his previous analysis, I believe that many ordinary people have begun to think that privatization is not necessarily good. Enterprises are not necessarily better than they are now, right?

And what is Jia Hongjian talking about now?That is to say, if these leaders resign and run away, will the company be bad?Jia Hongjian put forward a suggestion here - the local SASAC can openly recruit the public!There are more capable people in the society, and we have more than one billion people in China. Only a few former leaders can make the company do well?Isn't this bullshit?Are there no capable people in other companies?Yes or no?We are a public enterprise here. To solve the problem of establishment, we can give the person in charge a higher salary level and bonus level than the original one—as long as you can make the enterprise better than it is now!We can definitely make three chapters!If it's not done well, we can break the contract at any time and drive the other party away!Follow the professional manager system abroad in market economy!

In this way, Jia Hongjian basically blocked Li Dewei's words perfectly from the perspective of the common people - from the perspective of the common people, the company is MBO and privatized, since it is not necessarily good, since the most likely thing is for the boss to make a fortune Well, ordinary people are still ordinary people, and nothing has changed, so why do they have to support privatization?Since the factory has been doing well recently, we can openly recruit leaders. If the leader does not do well, he will leave. We can find a leader who can make our lives better!At least the enterprise is still under public ownership, and the benefits will be better in the future, and everyone will have a lot of bonuses, right?This is good for everyone! (To be continued..)