World of Gods

My recent situation is that after finishing the chapters at noon, I read the first round of book reviews in about half an hour, mainly to find the typos that the reader found, and to correct them in the first time, so that subsequent readers can read more smoothly.

Later, in the evening or the next day, I will read the second round of book reviews and read the reader's feedback.

Seen some feedback recently.

For example, some readers said that they do not like the interaction between male and female characters. This is normal feedback. I can see that I will find ways to improve.

However, some readers will say "these chapters are inexplicable", or "these chapters are poisonous points". I think that the motivation of these readers is "want this book to look better", first of all, thank you.

But then the problem came, I read these comments repeatedly, I really do n’t know what the “inexplicable” is, and I do n’t know where the “poisonous point” is, it ’s the character, it ’s the plot, it ’s the action, it ’s the description, It's rhetoric, bedding, or something else.

Therefore, I hope that readers will do me a favor. When expressing feedback, try to say "what specific paragraph or specific thing is wrong" so that I can see clearly.

For example, what do I think of Hult's personality.

For example, I think this rhetoric is too exaggerated, what milk or cream is awkward.

For example, I think that the five fiery people in this episode are not good enough to roll around, they need to be more vigorous.

Only by saying so, I understand, otherwise I really do n’t understand, even if I break my head and want to improve, I ca n’t do it.

The reason is simple. Each of us knows differently.

I have only recently discovered this problem. Everyone ’s perception is like a donut. Everyone is using their donuts to wrap things. Unfortunately, everyone ’s donuts look like our fingerprints or irises. , So caused a lot of misunderstandings between people.

Those who are at the top of various industries, either this ring is very large and can accommodate a lot of different, or there are more rings to set different things separately, this is the realm I am pursuing.

Uh, it seems to say too much, anyway, I can probably make it clear.

So let me mention a general three-step feedback model

For specific problems, I think Flame Goblin is a poison point.

, The specific reason is because I think the flame goblin **** is not enough (squint small expression)

, Specific improvements to make the flame goblin **** a little more! For example, written in peach shape ...

That's about it. Of course, if you are too lazy, just write the first two points.

Because the clearer and more complete you write, the more I read, the more likely this book is to improve.

Otherwise, if you type for a long time, you just don't make it clear. I can't see clearly. It may even have the opposite effect. This is the source of misunderstanding between men and women. Don't ask me how to know ...

Finally, thanks to every reader!

dhijianxian0

.